i've tried CDROM, netboot (linux-a.out, tftpboot.img),
just the same happens.
Sun Ultra 5/10 UPA/PCI (UltraSPARC-IIi 333MHz),
Keyboard Present
OpenBoot 3.15, 128 MB memory installed, Serial
#10913651.
Ethernet address 8:0:20:a6:87:73, Host ID: 80a68773.
ok boot cdrom
Boot device: /[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 04:43:28PM +0200, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
> Mandi! Roy Bixler
> In chel di` si favelave...
>
> > It's attached.
>
> Many thanks, i will try it.
Did it work? If not, at Christian Guggenberger's suggestion, I found
it harmless to just use the 'snapshot.debian.net' archive a
dpkg -l
Leith
--
http://qasr.mine.nu/";>Debian man pages, and other goodies
Mauricio wrote:
My solaris box has a proggie called pkginfo which shows which
packages I have currently installed in my machine:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>pkginfo
system BOLTpget pkg-get - CSW version
sy
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 07:39:15PM -0500, Mauricio wrote:
> My solaris box has a proggie called pkginfo which shows which
> packages I have currently installed in my machine:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-package.en.html#s-debian-package
There are a TON of commands for stu
My solaris box has a proggie called pkginfo which shows which
packages I have currently installed in my machine:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>pkginfo
system BOLTpget pkg-get - CSW version
system CSWcommoncommon - common files and dirs for
CSW packages
application CSWexp
Actually, I was wrong. It turns out prelinking was the culprit. I have
no idea what i did yesterday that caused it to suddenly work agian.. but
today, after going an upgrade again, my system broke in the same way. I
noticed that both upgrades involved installing a new version of
openoffice, (1.
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 06:02:00PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> You have to support that ones caused by your patches :)
>
> You can't expect me to field bug reports caused by patches that I didn't
> create. Users can surely expect you to field bugs caused by the patches
> you allow into your pac
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 05:45:34PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> Not to mention that a lot of the patches in Xu's sources breaks sparc
> builds, so I wont accept any bugs about stock kernel-source-2.4.24 not
> building on sparc.
>
> Generally I build-dep on the stock source, and usually back out
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 09:15:52AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 06:02:00PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > You have to support that ones caused by your patches :)
> >
> > You can't expect me to field bug reports caused by patches that I didn't
> > create. Users can surely
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 09:06:02AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 05:45:34PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > Not to mention that a lot of the patches in Xu's sources breaks sparc
> > builds, so I wont accept any bugs about stock kernel-source-2.4.24 not
> > building on sparc.
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 02:06:46PM -0800, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> Ben Collins is indeed correct. The source package for
> kernel-iamge-2.4.24-sparc64 dose build-dep on the debian kernel-source
> pkgs. However Herbert Xu is also correct as that source pkg dose contain
> patches too, that are not mai
Ben Collins is indeed correct. The source package for
kernel-iamge-2.4.24-sparc64 dose build-dep on the debian kernel-source
pkgs. However Herbert Xu is also correct as that source pkg dose contain
patches too, that are not maintained by him.
I would think that the small number of sparc only pat
Thank you for clearing this up. It workes great now.
--- Christian Guggenberger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 07:45, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> > 1. This pkg dose not exist, did you mean kernel-image-2.4-sparc?
> > 2. This pkg dose not contain the kernel-source or a buildable kern
Hehe, about 4 hrs for a stock(Debian) kernel build. If I cut it down it's
still like 2.5 hrs. X takes just as long.
VS
15 to 7 minuets on a K7.
--- andrew burd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> like you're gonna have to wait long on that machine.. sheesh
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From
> http://www.phunnypharm.org/pub/for/sparc-folks/disks-sparc/current/sparc64/tftpboot.img
This is what you want. Woody doesn't support UltraSPARC III/IIIi
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 06:17:34PM -0800, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> I was told by "Herbert Xu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, the maintainer
> of kernel-source-2.4.24, that his package was not the for use with sparcs.
> I looked all over and could not find another pkg. Dose any one know how
> to file bugs like
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 18:30, Patrick Finnegan wrote:
> On Thursday 01 April 2004 05:08, Christian Guggenberger wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 07:45, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> > > 1. This pkg dose not exist, did you mean kernel-image-2.4-sparc?
> > > 2. This pkg dose not contain the kernel-source or a
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 10:50:54 +0200
Marco Gaiarin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mandi! Christian Guggenberger
> In chel di` si favelave...
>
> > > Confirmation also on my Sun Blade 100 :-( any solutions yet ?
> > > Framebuffer device still works perfectly but X fails to start in any way
> > > ...
Hello.
I have a question: is there are any specifics in booting Sun's Sunblade2000 ?
It is a ultrasparc machine - I have downloaded the tftp install binaries for
woody and sarge and sarge mini-cd.iso but have not succeeded.
With cdrom install machine simply says "can not boot" and tftp way result
On Thu, 2004-04-01 08:52:13 +0200, Attila Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> When I do a stress test on my ss20, I always get:
>
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at
> bug in highmem.c
> ..
>
> 2x75 Supersparc-II.
> Debian woody/sarge 2.4.24
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 07:45, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> 1. This pkg dose not exist, did you mean kernel-image-2.4-sparc?
> 2. This pkg dose not contain the kernel-source or a buildable kernel tree.
> 3. There is also no kernel-source-sparc-2.4 or kernel-source-2.4-sparc
> even.
>
no, as I wrote: kerne
Mandi! Christian Guggenberger
In chel di` si favelave...
> > Confirmation also on my Sun Blade 100 :-( any solutions yet ?
> > Framebuffer device still works perfectly but X fails to start in any way
> >
i don't know your case, but for my Blade 150 X seems to work perfectly,
only produce
Mandi! Roy Bixler
In chel di` si favelave...
> I've noticed some X problems with a Sun Bade 100. When I upgraded to
> the xfree 4.3 packages, suddenly I can only get lower resolutions like
> 800x600.
...for now it will suffices for me... can you send (offlist) to me your
XF86Config-4?!
Thanks
Hi,
When I do a stress test on my ss20, I always get:
Unable to handle kernel paging request at
bug in highmem.c
..
2x75 Supersparc-II.
Debian woody/sarge 2.4.24, 2.4.25, 2.4.26-rc1 SMP kernels.
Is there something around highmem or what ?
Thank you
--
A t t i l a :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1. This pkg dose not exist, did you mean kernel-image-2.4-sparc?
2. This pkg dose not contain the kernel-source or a buildable kernel tree.
3. There is also no kernel-source-sparc-2.4 or kernel-source-2.4-sparc
even.
--- Christian Guggenberger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 04:
1. This pkg dose not exist, did you mean kernel-image-2.4-sparc?
2. This pkg dose not contain the kernel-source or a buildable kernel tree.
3. There is also no
--- Christian Guggenberger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 04:17, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> > I was told by "Herbert Xu" <
--- andrew burd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I never use the debian kernel packages.. just download the kernel tree
> and
> compile the source. install kernel-package and run make-kpkg
> kernel_image..
> it will create a .deb for you.
>
download the kernel tree: Do you mean an official kernel o
27 matches
Mail list logo
