In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>* Robert Lemmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 19:02]:
>> loading module 'ide-cd' for 'Linux ATAPI CD-ROM'
>> Error while running 'modprobe -v ide-cd'
>>
>> if i run modprobe in a console i get:
>> ELF file ... not for this architecture
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>* Magnus Hyllander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 20:46]:
>> Booting with "linux ramdisk_size=8192" gets me past the previous
>> problem. Now I get other errors just a little later during initial boot:
>>
>> Freeing unused kernel memory:
On Friday 14 May 2004 16:33, Andrew Sharp wrote:
> Yeah, there were patches available. I don't know if there were any
> in the package archive, but I tried that that exact thing on that
> exact machine. Be very careful, as that code had a nasty tendency to
> wipe out the disk label on one or more
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 11:10:36PM +0200, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a raid patch available for recent 2.2 kernels ? The latest I
> can find is for 2.2.20. Also, is there a version with 2.4 compatible
> superblocks ?
>
> I want to try 2.2 on my SMP Hypersparc SS20 (2.4 is only stab
Hi,
Is there a raid patch available for recent 2.2 kernels ? The latest I
can find is for 2.2.20. Also, is there a version with 2.4 compatible
superblocks ?
I want to try 2.2 on my SMP Hypersparc SS20 (2.4 is only stable in UP),
but I would prefer not to have to rebuild my raid5 array .
Frank
Joshua Kwan wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 01:56:25PM -0600, Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
I also saw this on a Sun Ultra 2.
Sun Ultra 2 UPA/Sbus (2 x UltraSPARC 200 MHz)
...
loaded kernel version 2.4.26
Loading initial ramdisk ( 1477684 bytes at 0x01x phys, 0x6080 virt)
...
RAMDISK: Couldn't f
> Thanks for trying it out. Ben, was that patch supposed to actually fix
> something, or was it just supposed to be informative?
Both.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 12:45:34PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> I tried http://june.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i/images/2004-05-14/drom-mini.iso
> on two machines, an Ultra1 and an Ultra10; both failed, though
> differently.
>
> Ultra1: On this one, I got (modulo any typos)
>
> Loading initial ram
* Robert Lemmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 19:02]:
> Package: debian-installer-demo
> Version: netinst 11.5.2004
>
> the netinst boots fine and starts the installer. after a while it goes:
>
> loading module 'ide-cd' for 'Linux ATAPI CD-ROM'
> Error while running 'modprobe -v ide-cd'
>
> if
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 03:39:53PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> Then you don't have the new second.b, and I've no idea where it is
> getting 0x600. That's not from my sources. The virtual address is
> hardcoded to 0x40c0.
My image come from:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/dai
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 01:56:25PM -0600, Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
> I also saw this on a Sun Ultra 2.
>
> Sun Ultra 2 UPA/Sbus (2 x UltraSPARC 200 MHz)
> ...
> loaded kernel version 2.4.26
> Loading initial ramdisk ( 1477684 bytes at 0x01x phys, 0x6080 virt)
> ...
> RAMDISK: Couldn't find val
Ben Collins wrote:
Ultra1: On this one, I got (modulo any typos)
Loading initial ramdisk (1477684 bytes at 0x01x phys 022340800 virt) ...
[spinning \/]
Remapping the kernel ... FP Disabled
ok
and I was back to the OpenBoot 'ok' prompt.
This is strange.
Ultra10: On this one,
> loaded kernel version 2.4.26
> Loading initial ramdisk ( 1477684 bytes at 0x01x phys, 0x6080 virt)
Crap, silo's printf doesn't support lx or llx. I need to fix that,
because I really need that info.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion -
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 08:47:45PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 02:06:02PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > So SILO doesn't have a message like:
> >
> > Loading initial ramdisk size (at phys, virt)
>
> Humpf, it was booting from hard disk.
> I have this:
> Loading ini
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 02:06:02PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> So SILO doesn't have a message like:
>
> Loading initial ramdisk size (at phys, virt)
Humpf, it was booting from hard disk.
I have this:
Loading inital ramdisk (1821913 bytes at 0x600)...
Hope it helps.
--
Julien Danjou
* Magnus Hyllander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 20:46]:
> Booting with "linux ramdisk_size=8192" gets me past the previous
> problem. Now I get other errors just a little later during initial boot:
>
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 132k freed
> Setting up filesystem, please wait ...
> echo[8]:
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 06:43:03PM +, nick macro wrote:
> I am running Debain Woody 3.0 r3 on a Sun UltraSparc 5 with 128Mb RAM, 8Gbyte
> hard disk.
> I am running GNOME window manager.
>
> I previously had the same problem on a Ultra 1 with 128Mb RAM, so I do not
> think this is
> a hardw
I am running Debain Woody 3.0 r3 on a Sun UltraSparc 5 with 128Mb RAM, 8Gbyte
hard disk.
I am running GNOME window manager.
I previously had the same problem on a Ultra 1 with 128Mb RAM, so I do not
think this is
a hardware or hardware related problem.
The problem is with SoundTracker, a GTK a
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 07:58:09PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 12:36:22PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Can you (and anyone else testing this initrd) send me the "Loading
> > initrd" line from silo aswell as the "prtconf -pv" output from the
> > machine if you are able to.
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 12:36:22PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> Can you (and anyone else testing this initrd) send me the "Loading
> initrd" line from silo aswell as the "prtconf -pv" output from the
> machine if you are able to.
>
I don't see anything about initrd after silo. :-/
Here is the prtc
Was this issue ever resolved? I am having the exact same problem except that
when I ssh in to kill X, it does not give me any tty's back and the keyboard
is still completely unresponsive (I have to reboot). The lights for Caps
Lock, Num Lock, etc are even out and unresponsive. I can't figure it
Hello.
I'm running Debian stable in an Enterprise 250 with linux 2.4.19. Some
time ago, the LED of CDROM drive started to blink, and it did not stop
so far. The CD unit is now unusable; it can not eject. It starts
blinking immediately after boot. I tried several Openboot commands in
order to re
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 12:18:40PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> Am I to understand that this is based on the new cd image with my
> silo/kernel fixes?
Probably since this ISO was built on 20040511.
> If so, did you have problems booting the initrd
> before?
I got problem with beta 4 of the instal
On Fri, 14 May 2004, Ben Collins wrote:
AD> Ultra10: On this one, I got much further. The kernel was loading,
AD> but failed near the end. The last messages were
AD>
AD> RAMDISK: couldn't find valid ramdisk image starting at 0.
AD> Freeing initrd memory 1443k freed
AD> cramfs: wrong
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 06:49:06PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 12:18:40PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Am I to understand that this is based on the new cd image with my
> > silo/kernel fixes?
>
> Probably since this ISO was built on 20040511.
>
> > If so, did you have p
> Ultra1: On this one, I got (modulo any typos)
>
> Loading initial ramdisk (1477684 bytes at 0x01x phys 022340800 virt) ...
> [spinning \/]
> Remapping the kernel ... FP Disabled
> ok
>
> and I was back to the OpenBoot 'ok' prompt.
This is strange.
> Ultra10: On this one, I
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> [ Sorry for the huge crosspost, but this is a pretty big deal. ]
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 04:21:46PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Some people have reported problems with initrd on sparc64. I'm trying to
> > trace that problem (hard, because I can't rep
> > > I got the same type of warnings between the boot of the CDROM kernel and
> > > the first stage of the installer.
> >
> > Let's ask debian-sparc about this. So apparently the system boots
> > fine, but those warnings are displayed. Can/should anything be done
> > about this?
Am I to unders
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 04:11:08PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 16:53]:
> > > > I did not have any problem, only some warning during boot of the CDROM
> > > > about unimplemented SPARC instruction.
> > >
> > When I boot I still have these warning
* Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 16:53]:
> > > I did not have any problem, only some warning during boot of the CDROM
> > > about unimplemented SPARC instruction.
> >
> When I boot I still have these warnings:
> % dmesg | grep Unimplemented
> readlink[12]: Unimplemented SPARC system
Are you looking for someone to talk to..
You have friends so you think that you?re more than O.K.
If you still have dreams that you?re missing somebody real
Click below and meet someone who?s waiting for you...
http://allsayyes.com/web/?oc=53032688
Norton AntiVirus ha trovato un virus in un allegato inviato da
(debian-sparc@lists.debian.org) a Cancelli Anna.
Per garantire che i destinatari possano utilizzare i file inviati, eseguire una
scansione dei virus, ripulire eventuali file infetti e inviare di nuovo
l'allegato.
Allegato: part2.
> I hope that this resolves the issues with SILO and initrd!
Me too!
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
Fri, 14 May 2004 06:00:58 -0500
Sir or Madam,
Thank you for your mor.tgage applicat.ion we
received yesterday.
We are happy to confirm that your appli cation is accepted and you can
get only 3 % fixed ra te.
Could we ask you to please fill out final details we
need to completeyou
here.
We
Mandi! Derek Zeanah
In chel di` si favelave...
> Is this a known problem with a simple fix?
...stupid reply, i suppose, but is a feature and not a bug of
getty/login to switch to UPPERCASE if some initial input was UPPERCASE,
simply to preserve compatibility with old terminal that understand on
[ Sorry for the huge crosspost, but this is a pretty big deal. ]
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 04:21:46PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> Some people have reported problems with initrd on sparc64. I'm trying to
> trace that problem (hard, because I can't reproduce it). If you've had
> the problem where silo
36 matches
Mail list logo
