On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 21:33:09 -0500
Patrick Finnegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm. I saw the same problem on an Ultra 5 running 2.6.7 with woody.
> Does it have to be newer than that?
The fix was made on March 24th, 2004. So it should be in there.
Your followup to this email indicates that
On Tuesday 06 July 2004 21:33, you wrote:
> Hmm. I saw the same problem on an Ultra 5 running 2.6.7 with woody.
> Does it have to be newer than that?
Actually, I'm wrong, it was 2.4.18, when upgraded to Sarge. I ended up
having some other problems that I was confusing with this (the keymap
tha
On Tuesday 06 July 2004 20:58, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 21:33:21 -0400 (EDT)
>
> Andy Tolonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have been running woody (kernel 2.4.24) happily for 6 months on
> > my ultra 10. this week, i decided to upgrade to "testing" by
> > changing my sources
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 21:33:21 -0400 (EDT)
Andy Tolonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been running woody (kernel 2.4.24) happily for 6 months on my ultra
> 10. this week, i decided to upgrade to "testing" by changing my
> sources.list and running "apt-get dist-upgrade".
> everything appeared t
Hi,
I have been running woody (kernel 2.4.24) happily for 6 months on my ultra
10. this week, i decided to upgrade to "testing" by changing my
sources.list and running "apt-get dist-upgrade".
everything appeared to work fine. a few days later, i rebooted and only
the root fs mounted read-only.
Has anyone tackled this before and can help us?
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: RE: Sparcserver 10 install
Date: Monday 05 July 2004 09:27
From: "Nick [Stone]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Paul,
I'd love to know why this happens, because then I can finally use
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 18:43:05 -0400 (EDT)
JLB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It sounds like it would be worth your while to work on the creator3d
> > xfree86 driver to get the DRM support operational again. It would
> > be an excellent and welcomed contribution on your part.
> >
> > I look forward
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, David S. Miller wrote:
> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 15:38:28 -0700
> From: David S. Miller
> To: JLB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Direct rendering: No
>
> On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 17:51:15 -0400 (EDT)
> JLB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 18:13:34 -0400
Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seriously, though - don't simply disable somthing that people are using -
> give the user a choice as to what behavior s?he wants.
It was simply not possible given the current way the XAA layer
is architected. It's incom
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 17:51:15 -0400 (EDT)
JLB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, the only good ATI drivers are closed-source and x86-only. Some of us
> care about such things.
Not true, the xfree86 and x11.org ATI drivers support the 7500
and similar families with full OpenGL acceleration. I know
On Tuesday 06 July 2004 13:33, Sean Minotti wrote:
> I'm wondering if the floppy/internet install should end with a SILO
> install but didn't for some reason. Or whether I need to add the path
> and file name to the boot command. Like
Umm, Sparc 10s suffer from a prom bug which prevents booting un
I hate to go with a 'me, too' post - but me, too. :)
Seriously, though - don't simply disable somthing that people are using -
give the user a choice as to what behavior s?he wants.
I too use the 3D support for Creator3D on an older kernel. If I had upgraded
and found the support removed, I wou
That is a truly lovely alternative for people with money.
Also, the only good ATI drivers are closed-source and x86-only. Some of us
care about such things.
Many people on this list doubtless are quite poor (I know I am) and merely
have an old surplus Sparc given by a friend. It is quite insultin
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 17:29:01 -0400 (EDT)
JLB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Suggest an alternative then. One with 3D acceleration support -and- nice
> font support.
An x86 system with an ATI Radeon :-)
For sparc64, no such options exist currently until someone gets
the ATI Radeon support working on
Suggest an alternative then. One with 3D acceleration support -and- nice
font support.
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, David S. Miller wrote:
> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 14:24:50 -0700
> From: David S. Miller
> To: Erwann Abalea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Direct rende
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 22:50:53 +0200 (CEST)
Erwann Abalea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What have I done wrong? What can I do to have hardware 3D acceleration
> again with my Creator3D FFB1? (except reverting back to stable)
In order to add support for the render extension of xfree86
(ie. get nice fo
Bonsoir,
Some weeks ago, on my Ultra2+Creator3D machine, I was running
Debian/stable with a 2.4.18 kernel.had to manually compile the DRM kernel
part, because the normal kernel compilation process wouldn't want to
compile it (with no warning or error, it simply was forgetted).
At this time, glxinf
On Tuesday 06 Jul 2004 19:33, Sean Minotti wrote:
>
> Hmm, I don't know what posessed me (thanks for the spelling correction).
> Unfortunately your suggestion didn't help.
>
> Here's what I get:
> ok boot
> iommu/sbus/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],80/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0
> File and args:
Gary Parker wrote:
-Original Message-
From: JLB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 July 2004 15:58
To: Sean Minotti
Cc: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Sparcstation 10 boot ?
The plural of "floppy" is "floppies".
Well, that was helpful, wasn't it?
Try 'boot disk1',
On Jul 06, "David S. Miller" wrote:
> It outputs "sparc64" on sparc64 Linux systems.
> It has never output "sun4u", only Solaris systems
> do that.
Good to know, looks like this has been broken since the original
modutils package then...
I will fix it in the next upload.
--
ciao, |
Marco | [703
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 12:42:43 +0200
"Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did the output of uname -m change?
> The script is expecting it to be sun4u on sparc64 systems.
It outputs "sparc64" on sparc64 Linux systems.
It has never output "sun4u", only Solaris systems
do that.
Dear listmembers,
to boot appropriately from the sarge CD's I need to load the aic7xxx -
module because my hdd cannot be connected to the internal controller.
Can some nice guy tell me how to get that file (and where?) on the latest
sarge. I downloaded the images with jigdo. However, the kernel im
> -Original Message-
> From: JLB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 July 2004 15:58
> To: Sean Minotti
> Cc: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Sparcstation 10 boot ?
>
> The plural of "floppy" is "floppies".
Well, that was helpful, wasn't it?
Try 'boot disk1', your OpenPROM
The plural of "floppy" is "floppies".
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Sean Minotti wrote:
> Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:55:07 -0400
> From: Sean Minotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Sparcstation 10 boot ?
> Resent-Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 09:55:09 -0500 (CDT)
> Resent-From:
I've downloaded the floppy's and installed to the hd. All seemed to go
well. Now what do I type at the openboot prompt. I've tried boot linux,
boot vmlinuz boot sysvinit etc. I get a message to the effect that the
file loaded doesn't seem to be executable. Also my resue disk, made
with dd do
On Jul 06, marco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When i do apt-get install module-init-tools apt will get it and then:
> Setting up module-init-tools (3.1-pre2-2) ...
> Configuration for sparc64 not found, trying sparc64.generic
> Architecture-specific config file not found
Did the output of uname -m
26 matches
Mail list logo
