-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Brandon Mercer wrote:
Also, I don't know how you'd ever build a box for 700 bucks running
scsi.
Actually, in the comparison Dave was making (Sun Blade 1500 to an Opteron
based sever), SCSI probably isn't applicable as a Sun Blade
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:01:17 -0500
Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason I asked was because the IBM article I linked to earlier
> seemed to indicate the problem cropped up on 64 bit systems.
That problem in that article is S390 platform specific. They
use these higher-order alloc
After my succesfull install of sarge on a Balde 100 I doscoverd
that the permissions for /tmp are wrong.
It should be drwxrwxrwx but it is drwxr-xr-x also
the partition recipe of d-i created a seperated tmp partition
/dev/hda7 there was no ext3 filesystem created on it
and /dev/shm tmpfs was mounte
The reason I asked was because the IBM article I linked to earlier
seemed to indicate the problem cropped up on 64 bit systems.
In any case, I can't recall coming across this issue before, and most
of the systems I run have far less memory than this beast. :)
Is there a way to fix this?
On Wed
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:20:25 -0500
Brandon Mercer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do not know what you're talking about. Sparcs use considerably less
> power, run cooler, last longer, are more stable and are comparable with
> speed.
You've got to be kidding me. Maybe for ancient pre-UltraSPARC b
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:58:58 -0500
Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This doesn't sound useful for servers. :) Is this an issue with Linux
> in general, or only with certain ports?
When I said "The kernel" I did mean Linux in general not for a
specific port such as Sparc.
--
To UNSUB
David S. Miller wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:51:29 -0600
>Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Dale Scheetz wrote: (snippage throughout)
>>
>>
>>
>>>I have been tasked with picking the hardware, and my feeling is that
>>>SPARC offers the best bang for the buck.
>>>
>>>
>>Let
This doesn't sound useful for servers. :) Is this an issue with Linux
in general, or only with certain ports?
Is there a patch, or something else I can do to keep this from
happening again?
As far as uptime goes...
17:58:45 up 78 days, 5:08, 18 users, load average: 0.28, 0.27, 0.23
On Tue,
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:51:29 -0600
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dale Scheetz wrote: (snippage throughout)
>
> >I have been tasked with picking the hardware, and my feeling is that
> >SPARC offers the best bang for the buck.
>
> Let me preface this by saying I have no idea what I'm talk
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>I have been tasked with picking the hardware, and my feeling is that
>SPARC offers the best bang for the buck. I have been pointed at two
>different lines of machines by a Systems Engineer for Sun here in
>Tallahassee, but I was hoping that you guys would
Dale Scheetz wrote: (snippage throughout)
I have been working for the Florida
Department of State, Division of Cultural Affairs.
I am currently building a new database for the Division. It is web
based Apache/php4/postgreSQL software that will allow Individuals and
Organizations to view and update
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 14:07, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 March 2005 21:19, Frans Pop wrote:
> > The first issue is with USB keyboards by Sun as used on
> > for example SunBlade systems. These are incorrectly "recognized" by
> > the installer as regular Sun keyboards. A workaro
For the past several years I have been working for the Florida
Department of State, Division of Cultural Affairs. We make grants to
Florida Arts organizations and some small stipends to Individual
Artists.
I am currently building a new database for the Division. It is web
based Apache/php4/postgre
* Uwe A. P. Wuerdinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-30 03:27]:
> >>Is this on O2? It worked for me last night.
> >Yep. I just went through it again. I wonder if the install gets
> >confused if it thinks there's already a previous installation?
>
> I've seen exactly that behavier with RC3 netboo
Il messaggio sotto riportato, spedito dal vostro indirizzo di posta,
contiene un VIRUS e pertanto non è stato consegnato.
Probabilmente il computer dal quale è stato spedito è infetto.
CONTROLLATELO QUANTO PRIMA CON UN PROGRAMMA ANTIVIRUS!
A message containing a virus was sent from your e-mail add
15 matches
Mail list logo
