I had assumed it would be included with the main package. Let me check.
Ok, strace includes strace64 binary. Not sure what the deal is with gdb.
I'll check with the maintainer to see what happened to that patch.
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 12:18:57PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 200
Hi,
I'm trying to start the installation CD on a Sun sparcstation. I
forgot the key combination to default the boot search in the cdrom. If
any body knows the same please let me knwo asap.
regards
You should just be able to hit Stop-A and then type boot cdrom on most
Sparc 5's.
If your using a PC style keyboard and not a Sun, then I have no idea. :(
--Chris
On Mon, 23 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to start the installation CD on a Sun sparcstation. I
> forgot th
Le lundi 23 mai 2005 à 12:43 -0400, Chris Trainor a écrit :
> You should just be able to hit Stop-A and then type boot cdrom on most
> Sparc 5's.
>
> If your using a PC style keyboard and not a Sun, then I have no idea. :(
Stop-A is just a «break».
Probably «ctrl-b» would work.
> --Chris
[..]
Hi,
Assuming you have a keyboard attached to the machine, type STOP-a
while booting to get the prom prompt, then type "boot cdrom". This will
work as long as the alias for the cdrom is set up up correctly. If not,
or if I have missed the point of your question, you'd better wait for
someone more e
thanks a bunch to all ! I got it. My next task is to setup the X. I
don't know which card i've.
I'll try first.
regards
-a
On 23 May 2005 10:02:05 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Assuming you have a keyboard attached to the machine, type STOP-a
> while booting to ge
Hello group, Thanks a bunch for replying my earlier question.
I'm having problems in installting the X windows. I indexed the
packages using CDROM and tried to install the same. Nothing seems to
happen. Your help will be appreciated.
I'm searching on line and will try more.
regards
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 10:48 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> thanks a bunch to all ! I got it. My next task is to setup the X. I
> don't know which card i've.
> I'll try first.
The C conrfiguration part of the installation usually problems display
adaptors and sets all that up for you.
--
To U
Hello.
On Monday 23 May 2005 20:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello group, Thanks a bunch for replying my earlier question.
> I'm having problems in installting the X windows. I indexed the
> packages using CDROM and tried to install the same. Nothing seems to
> happen. Your help will be apprecia
The other alternative is to "touch /etc/disable_64_gcc
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 04:05:21PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Sat, 21 May 2005 14:06:52 +0200
> Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > this bug has been open for quite some time as "important". Can some
> > sparc people please
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 13:24:18 -0700
> The other alternative is to "touch /etc/disable_64_gcc
Sure, but in the mail you are specifically replying to I stated:
> > Also, /etc/disable_64_gcc is a workaround and should not be there
> > by default as it is now, especially on
Hi,
I'm having problems with the esp SCSI driver on a Sun E4000. I'm
running a patched version of 2.6.11.9 with two disks and a CDROM attaced
to esp0 and 7 disks attached to esp1. I'm running software RAID 5 on
the 7 disk set and under high load (the first time when trying to use
debootstrap o
You're right. Didn't get down that far. As far as I'm concerned, the
default 64-bit is the right thing. But it's hard to convince long time
users that a machine that is 99% 32-bit userspace, should compile 64-bit
binaries by default, when 99% of the time, those same people are going to
want 32-bit.
From: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 20:21:57 -0400
> But (and this but is for David), that means users can't simply do
> "apt-get source foo; cd foo-1.1; dpkg-buildpackage" and get the same build
> they got from us, which is a consistency Debian needs. Maintainers trying
>
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 07:27:22PM -0700, David S.Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 20:21:57 -0400
>
> > But (and this but is for David), that means users can't simply do
> > "apt-get source foo; cd foo-1.1; dpkg-buildpackage" and get the same build
> >
> >
> > Make the login environment be sparc32 by default. Doesn't that
> > solve the problem? And for die-hard 64-bit people like me they
> > can undo this via some configuration mechanism.
> >
> > It is one option.
>
> That's probably too ugly for some ppl. Then we'll have to answer the
> que
16 matches
Mail list logo
