Re: sparc buildd issues [Re: Release candidate architecture requalification results; amd64 is RC]

2005-12-27 Thread William Herrin
I hadn't seen that, thanks. That sunsolve issue is kind of light on the details, but it implies a random drift of a few seconds. The symptoms I see are a sudden forward jump of exactly 3d 6:11:15. Every time it happened I saw exactly the same jump, after which some programs continue running while o

Re: sparc buildd issues [Re: Release candidate architecture requalification results; amd64 is RC]

2005-12-27 Thread Alexander Zangerl
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:04:50 EST, William Herrin writes: >On a Sparc netra X1, the system partially freezes (some stuff continues >running but at least one of the operations necessary to log in gets stuck). >The logs show that as of the moment of the freeze, the clock has jumped >forward exactly 3

bug tracking for non-RC architectures

2005-12-27 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi folks, For architectures that are not release candidates, we are going to need another way to track "release critical" bugs. The whole point of having architecture criteria is so the project can give higher priority to issues affecting release architectures (or all architectures) than to issue

Re: sparc buildd issues [Re: Release candidate architecture requalification results; amd64 is RC]

2005-12-27 Thread Admar Schoonen
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 01:04:50PM -0500, William Herrin wrote: > On 12/27/05, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What is this kernel problem, how does it manifest? Which branch, 2.4 or > > 2.6? > > > > I don't know if this is the same problem you're looking for, but here are > the symp

Re: sparc buildd issues [Re: Release candidate architecture requalification results; amd64 is RC]

2005-12-27 Thread Daniel J. Priem
Can i also repoduce this on a sarge machine / what are the requirements to get this happen. only the kernel or more? is a chroot with sid/etch inside enough? What can i do to help the porters with this issue.? I know that rene is doing some OOo builds here, but i am didn't heard the last time that

Re: sparc buildd issues [Re: Release candidate architecture requalification results; amd64 is RC]

2005-12-27 Thread William Herrin
On 12/27/05, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: What is this kernel problem, how does it manifest? Which branch, 2.4 or 2.6? I don't know if this is the same problem you're looking for, but here are the symptoms I've seen for kernels 2.6.11 and 2.6.12: On a Sparc netra X1, the system partial

Re: sparc buildd issues [Re: Release candidate architecture requalification results; amd64 is RC]

2005-12-27 Thread Blars Blarson
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >What is this kernel problem, how does it manifest? Which branch, 2.4 or 2.6? Assuming this is what I have seen on my sparc pbuilder (ultra 2, dual 300Mhz), the symptom is the system rebooting (or, less often, crashing and needing a power cy

sparc buildd issues [Re: Release candidate architecture requalification results; amd64 is RC]

2005-12-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 04:14:35AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Sun SPARC > - > Initially, it seemed like sparc ought to have the easiest time of the > four to get requalified. Despite misgivings earlier this year about > upstream support, sparc is generally doing well; since the sarge >

BTTV and SPARC (stable with 2.4.27)

2005-12-27 Thread Boer Attila Laszlo
Hi, In my previous posts (BTTV and SPARC) I mentioned some problems regarding the bttv driver and the 2.6 kernel series: the machine (Sun Ultra 10) locks up after about 20 minutes. Recently I have tried bttv (0.9.15) with the 2.4.27 kernel and everything seems to be fine. I didn't notice any locku