Hi, I've read in a couple of places that there's consideration of dropping
Sparc32 support totally for Etch? Is this true, and if so is there
anything I can do to help stop that happening?
I've just reinstalled my Sparcbook laptops with Linux (and was going to do
the other machines I have
Zoe Parsons wrote:
Hi, I've read in a couple of places that there's consideration of dropping
Sparc32 support totally for Etch? Is this true, and if so is there
anything I can do to help stop that happening?
I've just reinstalled my Sparcbook laptops with Linux (and was going to do
the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi, I've read in a couple of places that there's consideration of dropping
Sparc32 support totally for Etch? Is this true, and if so is there
anything I can do to help stop that happening?
The main things that need work:
debian-installer
I have an ulterior motive for this of course - I want a usable,
stable debian port for Sparc.
Could you try repeatedly installing and purging the build-dependencies
for openoffice.org while running kernel-image-2.6.8-2-sparc64-smp on your
SB1000?
The objective is to reproduce a crash that
Quoting Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Could you try repeatedly installing and purging the build-dependencies
for openoffice.org while running kernel-image-2.6.8-2-sparc64-smp on your
SB1000?
The objective is to reproduce a crash that occurs on the dual-proc
autobuilders.
Hi Clint,
can
can you give more info about the crash, where it occurs in building
openoffice.org? tail of the build log would be good.
I'm told that it usually occurs while doing the dpkg -i of the
build-deps, and possibly most recently while dpkg was installing
debconf-i18n.
I am continually building the
On Thursday 02 February 2006 08:20, Nathan Ollerenshaw wrote:
I have a Sun Blade 1000 with Dual 650Mhz Ultrasparc III CPUs and
512MB ram (trying to source more ram at the moment) with 250GB
firewire drive. Its plugged into a 100mbit FTTH link located in my
home. The link is very stable,
Dear Debian people,
I recently tried linux-image-2.6.15-1-sparc64 with an up to date unstable on my
blade 100. I noticed a few issues:
1. Framebuffer is still a bit distorted. This is (or at least was) a known
issue for recent kernels (bug id 317756). However, this bug is closed, but
On Thursday 02 February 2006 22:31, Paul Cobbaut wrote:
Sorry for asking a stupid question, but does this include support
for UltraSparc ?
Or is Sparc64 considered a different architecture from Sparc32 ?
Sparc32 and sparc64 are separate subarchitectures within the sparc port.
Currently the
On Thursday 02 February 2006 21:25, Joey Hess wrote:
I've also successfully installed etch on a sparc4c machine (using the
2.6 kernel; 2.4 doesn't work), and it works ok. IIRC the earlier
problems seem to be resolved.
Jurij:
Do you think we should make an effort to support sparc32 using 2.6
Frans Pop wrote:
Do you think we should make an effort to support sparc32 using 2.6 for
d-i? You said yourself that things were looking better and these reports
seem to confirm it.
This will be after the Beta2 release of the installer though.
FWIW, my testing on that machine (wildebeest)
unsubscribe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
Jurij:
Do you think we should make an effort to support sparc32 using 2.6 for
d-i? You said yourself that things were looking better and these reports
seem to confirm it.
This will be after the Beta2 release of the installer though.
I've had plans for a
Thanks for your replies everyone. As it happens, finally got a
console message saying:
CPU[1]: UDBH Syndrome[0] Memory Module U1302 U0302 U1301 U0301
CPU[3]: Correctable ECC Error AFSR[10] AFAR[40099350] UDBL
[0] UDBH[131]
CPU[3]: UDBH Syndrome[0] Memory Module U1302 U0302
15 matches
Mail list logo
