On Mon, 2006-03-13 11:18:07 +1000, Alexander Zangerl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 16:31:55 PST, Jurij Smakov writes:
> > the external LCD display. Any sparc which needs it?
>
> as there is lcdproc which provides similar functionality without
> the silly "all the wor
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, Chance Platt wrote:
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 17:35 -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
The CONFIG_PARPORT_PC_FIFO option has been disabled in sparc kernel
packages since 2.6.14-3.
Any chance this "fix" might make it into Sarge?
That's highly unlikely, sorry.
Jurij Smakov
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 17:35 -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, Chance Platt wrote:
>
> > This may or may not be helpful; however in my case, on an Ultra 60,
> > CONFIG_PARPORT_PC_FIFO causes printing to not work. Compiling this
> > option out makes it work.
> >
> > It's a shame, re
Hi,
When trying to run either xine or totem on my ultrasparc, I reach no
success with either.
In the case of xine, I run the binary. The Xine splashscreen pops up
and disappears, and you see the usual xine GUI and window, followed
quickly by them closing. It spits the following out on the com
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, Chance Platt wrote:
This may or may not be helpful; however in my case, on an Ultra 60,
CONFIG_PARPORT_PC_FIFO causes printing to not work. Compiling this
option out makes it work.
It's a shame, really -- outside of this flaw, the shipped kernel works
flawlessly (and for m
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 00:19 +, Martin wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 12:05 +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > (I'm not subscribe this list, so please Cc me too)
> >
> > I've UltraSparc Ultra5, with memory 128Mb, UltraSPARC-IIi 270MHz
> > with sarge (but kernel is 2.6.12-1-sparc6
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 16:31:55 PST, Jurij Smakov writes:
>lcd4linux Fails with 'unknown opcode `rep'' during build. Has
> some arch-specific asm? Program to display info on
*az looks at the code in question. a busy-waiting udelay?!? az shudders*
> the external LCD d
Hi,
There is currently a number of packages which fail to build on sparc
simply because sparc is not mentioned in the architecture list in
debian/control. Usually it means that either the upstream does not
support sparc arch, or maintainer decided that it's not worth supporting
it. It is up to
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 12:05 +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> (I'm not subscribe this list, so please Cc me too)
>
> I've UltraSparc Ultra5, with memory 128Mb, UltraSPARC-IIi 270MHz
> with sarge (but kernel is 2.6.12-1-sparc64).
>
> I recently connect a canon printer on parport and try
9 matches
Mail list logo