On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 22:10:03 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 08:20:01PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 18:22:57 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > The first patch is fine. The revert is not.
> > Even if the revert is the only way to get X to work
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 08:20:01PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 18:22:57 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > The first patch is fine. The revert is not.
> Even if the revert is the only way to get X to work on those machines in
> lenny?
I fail to see the _kernel_ bug it fixes
Michael wrote:
Does Debian 4 support rebuilding this server's RAID 1 while online? If
not, would a viable option for recovery from hard drive failure be a
script which uses ldconfig to change root directories to a hot spare
which is identical to the other drive?
I also just found out about co-
Does Debian 4 support rebuilding this server's RAID 1 while online? If
not, would a viable option for recovery from hard drive failure be a
script which uses ldconfig to change root directories to a hot spare
which is identical to the other drive?
I also just found out about co-processors availibl
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 18:22:57 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> The first patch is fine. The revert is not.
>
Even if the revert is the only way to get X to work on those machines in
lenny?
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
2008/11/11, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Go on and read the discussion of this bug if you really interested why
>> these patches differ.
>
> You want something from us. Also the bugreport reads itself as two
> different bugs, which does not make it easier to understand.
Bastian, what shou
Bastian Blank wrote:
You want something from us. Also the bugreport reads itself as two
different bugs, which does not make it easier to understand.
I beg to differ: if he's the one who's really sorted out this problem
then I think we want something from him. Badly.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
mar
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:46:24AM +0300, Max Dmitrichenko wrote:
> > It is the decision of the maintainer if nothing else matches.
> Ok. Who is the maintainer?
debian-kernel, represented by whom doing the work.
> Go on and read the discussion of this bug if you really interested why
> these patc
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 10:30:38PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > SPARC is a traditionally brand
> > architecture. This case
> > affects Ultra 5 and may be several other workstation. So if something
> > doesn't function
> > on one box it doesn't function on a whole gen
9 matches
Mail list logo
