Re: sparc64 porterbox

2010-09-23 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 13:39:24 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > Right. So I rephrase my initial question: Is there a box (or perhaps > a chroot?) that uses 64bit userspace available? Supposedly similar to > the one used by the "sparc64" buildd? Not AFAIK. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Descript

Re: sparc64 porterbox

2010-09-23 Thread Damyan Ivanov
-=| Alexander Zangerl, Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 06:46:06PM +1000 |=- > On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 07:41:50 +0300, Damyan Ivanov writes: > >So what does the sparc64 buildd do differently than the "plain sparc" > >one? > > the sparc64 buildd *is* the plain sparc buildd. There must be something different, sin

Re: sparc64 porterbox

2010-09-23 Thread Damyan Ivanov
[please continue CC-ing, thanks] -=| Julien Cristau, Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:34:39AM +0200 |=- > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:41:50 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > > -=| Alexander Zangerl, Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:41:56AM +1000 |=- > > > On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:11:38 +0300, Damyan Ivanov writes: > > > >

Re: sparc64 porterbox

2010-09-23 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:41:50 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > (replying to list; please cc) > > -=| Alexander Zangerl, Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:41:56AM +1000 |=- > > On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:11:38 +0300, Damyan Ivanov writes: > > >However, there doesn't seem to be a sparc64 porter box available. >