On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 13:39:24 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> Right. So I rephrase my initial question: Is there a box (or perhaps
> a chroot?) that uses 64bit userspace available? Supposedly similar to
> the one used by the "sparc64" buildd?
Not AFAIK.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Descript
-=| Alexander Zangerl, Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 06:46:06PM +1000 |=-
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 07:41:50 +0300, Damyan Ivanov writes:
> >So what does the sparc64 buildd do differently than the "plain sparc"
> >one?
>
> the sparc64 buildd *is* the plain sparc buildd.
There must be something different, sin
[please continue CC-ing, thanks]
-=| Julien Cristau, Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:34:39AM +0200 |=-
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:41:50 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> > -=| Alexander Zangerl, Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:41:56AM +1000 |=-
> > > On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:11:38 +0300, Damyan Ivanov writes:
> > > >
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:41:50 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> (replying to list; please cc)
>
> -=| Alexander Zangerl, Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:41:56AM +1000 |=-
> > On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:11:38 +0300, Damyan Ivanov writes:
> > >However, there doesn't seem to be a sparc64 porter box available.
>
4 matches
Mail list logo