On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 13:44 -0500, Patrick Baggett wrote:
> > I didn't see where GCC was dropping 32-bit sparc upstream in the
> > changelogs. This seems inaccurate since a 64-bit userland has negative
> > performance implications, and this
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 13:44 -0500, Patrick Baggett wrote:
> I didn't see where GCC was dropping 32-bit sparc upstream in the
> changelogs. This seems inaccurate since a 64-bit userland has negative
> performance implications, and this is true for both Solaris and Linux
> and not recommended by anyo
Adam,
I didn't see where GCC was dropping 32-bit sparc upstream in the
changelogs. This seems inaccurate since a 64-bit userland has negative
performance implications, and this is true for both Solaris and Linux and
not recommended by anyone. A 64-bit userland is barely available for Linux
-- just
3 matches
Mail list logo