On 30/07/2015, David Miller wrote:
> From: Josip Rodin
> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 21:22:30 +0200
>
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 06:48:24PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>>> > But I think the focus should probably be on the sheer redness of the
>>> > sparc
>>> > columns at:
>>> > https://release.debian.o
Hi,
Christian PERRIER (2015-07-27):
> Quoting Joerg Jaspert (jo...@debian.org):
> > Hi,
> >
> > following the last[1] announce, I just removed sparc from
> >
> > unstable
> > experimental
> > jessie-updates
>
> .../...
>
> As a consequence, should we keep sparc-only packages -I know about
> s
From: Josip Rodin
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 21:22:30 +0200
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 06:48:24PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> > But I think the focus should probably be on the sheer redness of the sparc
>> > columns at:
>> > https://release.debian.org/jessie/arch_qualify.html (current release)
>>
>
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 06:48:24PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > But I think the focus should probably be on the sheer redness of the sparc
> > columns at:
> > https://release.debian.org/jessie/arch_qualify.html (current release)
>
> >From the link above:
> "
> sparc
>
> Upstream Support
>
> Ac
From: Sam Ravnborg
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:48:24 +0200
> From the link above:
> "
> sparc
>
> Upstream Support
>
> According to the gcc maintainer 32bit code generation as we use it is no
> longer supported upstream and we should aim for a switch to 64bit userland
> anytime soon.
> "
>
> I
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> But I think the focus should probably be on the sheer redness of the sparc
>> columns at:
>> https://release.debian.org/jessie/arch_qualify.html (current release)
>
> >From the link above:
> "
> sparc
>
> Upstream Support
>
> According to th
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > But I think the focus should probably be on the sheer redness of the
> sparc
> > columns at:
> > https://release.debian.org/jessie/arch_qualify.html (current release)
>
> >From the link above:
> "
> sparc
>
> Upstream Support
>
> According
> But I think the focus should probably be on the sheer redness of the sparc
> columns at:
> https://release.debian.org/jessie/arch_qualify.html (current release)
>From the link above:
"
sparc
Upstream Support
According to the gcc maintainer 32bit code generation as we use it is no longer
suppo
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 04:04:54PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Debian have decided to drop support for sparc.
> See additional details here:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2015/07/msg00023.html
>
> To the best of my understanding this is 32 bit userland
> on top of sparc64
9 matches
Mail list logo