On 06/04/2016 05:53 PM, Patrick Baggett wrote:
> Yeah, the memcpy with a word will probably be wrong due to endian issues when
> it is stored because dst[3] would be written in the first byte, but they are
> assuming that dst[3] is the last byte, given that they do OR with 0xff << 24,
> i.e.
On Saturday, June 4, 2016, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> On 06/03/2016 11:49 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > So, maybe we're lucky and just the above patch will be enough :).
> >
> > Will build gegl now to verify this.
>
> And, indeed, gegl now builds
On 06/03/2016 11:49 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> So, maybe we're lucky and just the above patch will be enough :).
>
> Will build gegl now to verify this.
And, indeed, gegl now builds fine on sparc64 [1].
Note the comments in the upstream bug tracker though [2] where it
is suggested to
3 matches
Mail list logo
