Re: Bug#840423 closed by James Clarke <jrt...@jrtc27.com> (Re: Bug#840423: New upstream version with sparc64 support)

Control: reopen -1 In fact, 9bb9f09 itself broke sparc64 and s390x. Please update to 002cbb5 to fix this. Regards, James signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#840423: New upstream version with sparc64 support

Version: 0.0~git20161012.0.9bb9f09-1 On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 07:51:56PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Sorry for offlist and HTML (currently on the train). > > I just checked, they uploaded a new snapshot today. Can you check whether > your changes are in? Yes, they are. I probably

Re: Bug#840423: New upstream version with sparc64 support

Hi, On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 02:27:37PM +0100, James Clarke wrote: > Source: golang-golang-x-sys > Version: 0.0~git20160704.0.a408501-1 > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org > User: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org > Usertags: sparc64 > > Hi, > Upstream has made several commits to

Re: Bug#840574: Please backport libgo fixes for sparc64

Control: tags -1 - help + patch Hi Matthias, On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 01:50:43PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Control: tags -1 + help > Control: tags -1 - patch > > James, please could you name the revisions in the GCC subversion repository? > Afaics these are r241084, r241077, r241051. Even