Re: Binutils no longer autobuilding the cross-compiling packages...

2001-04-17 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Jeff Bailey wrote: > Excellent! The long binutils compiles were triggering a bug in the Hurd, > causing a crash, so I had to remove it from the autobuilder. I will > add it back in now. Thanks for letting me know this. All the more reason to get cross-compiling situated a

Binutils no longer autobuilding the cross-compiling packages...

2001-04-17 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
Just wanted to announce this... I'm removing the cross-compiler patches to debian/rules, etc. as of the upcoming 2.11.90.0.5-1. Until we get a better method for compiling these, I'd rather not have the packages available. As it stands, it takes several hours to build binutils and all of the cro

Re: Glibc, gcc, libdb2 and nss_db

2000-09-26 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: > The new gcc package build failed on Alpha during stage1 of the gpc > build. I can try eliminating gpc from the build for now (allowing me to > continue to get the new glibc stuff working), if that's an > option... This prob

Re: Glibc, gcc, libdb2 and nss_db

2000-09-26 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Ben Collins wrote: > Well, here it comes. Glibc 2.1.94, hot of the glibc release process. I'm > currently building i386, powerpc and sparc, which I will upload throughout > the day and tonight as I build them. These are going into woody. Several > notes for the other ports (t

Re: Glibc, gcc, libdb2 and nss_db

2000-09-25 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Ben Collins wrote: > Well, here it comes. Glibc 2.1.94, hot of the glibc release process. I'm > currently building i386, powerpc and sparc, which I will upload throughout > the day and tonight as I build them. These are going into woody. Several > notes for the other ports (t

Re: glibc 2.2 and gcc (Was Re: something completely different)

2000-08-03 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > Well, you can change the package name, but you must not change the soname > or you are going to break binary comaptiblity with every other alpha dist > out there. Our policy does say that the soname should be in the package > name which means this sche

Re: Any experience with Compaq cxx?

2000-05-09 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Tue, 9 May 2000, David van Leeuwen wrote: > Hi, > > I've tried to install compaq's cxx compiler (6.3.6.10) as an > alternative for g++, because i need speed in runtime. > > I used cxx-6.3.6.10-12.alpha.rpm from Compaq's website, `alien'd it, > and `dpkg --install'd it. Fine. Hand-edite

Re: Uploaded postgresql 6.4.2-9 (source i386 all) to chiark

1999-06-08 Thread Christopher C Chimelis
On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Oliver Elphick wrote: > I have put together a preliminary release of 6.5 (beta2) and the source > for it can be obtained from http://www.lfix.co.uk/postgresql. Could you > please try to build that and send me any diffs you may need to make. The tarball on your site is fubar