On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 10:15:51AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
> in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
>
> Brian
> ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
PowerPC ha
On Thu, Aug 20, 1998 at 10:32:02AM +0200, Christian Meder wrote:
>
> I will try to build on my sun4m here. Will you build the 2.0.95 version,
> Johnie or should I try to do it ? I will go from the 2.0.95 packaging from
> http://master.debian.org/~espy
Instead, use the one from slink. The one on
On Wed, Jul 29, 1998 at 10:01:48AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> OK, so it appears that hamm has disappeared from the archive (the sparc
> part of it anyway.)
>
> So I update my apt sources list to look in slink. No problem. But now, I
> get a lot of packages listed as obsolete/local. Looking at
On Wed, Jul 29, 1998 at 04:27:15PM +0200, Anders Hammarquist wrote:
> Haven't noticed that one (at least not on the alpha under 2.1.106), but
> I probably don't want to know...
Hmm. I know it appears on intel...
Dan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
On Tue, Jul 28, 1998 at 10:11:40PM +0200, Anders Hammarquist wrote:
> >Everything involving unpacking a .deb.
>
> Well, that overstating it a bit I think. What breaks is that dpkg-deb[1]
> runs chown(2) on everything it extracts from the archive, including
> symlinks. In recent 2.1 kernels, there
5 matches
Mail list logo
