On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 18:07, David Kalnischkies
wrote:
> It seems to be indeed the way the sha256 and sha512 checksums are
> calculated. To make it a bit obscure: we have a testcase checking them
> and they run successfully producing the correct output.
> (for reference:
imilar issue as it crashes, too]
SHA512 is very similar, so i presume it has the very same problem.
As i run out of time for today i am leaving these dangling pointers as
they are for now and hope someone can connect the dots. CC'ing sparc
mailinglist as they have properly a good chance t
start, could someone with access to a sparc-box recompile
0.8.15 with gcc-4.6 to verify that it is indeed compiler related?
(by observing that this rebuild would be broken, too)
(Adding d-sparc@d.l.o so they can have a look at that, too)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
3 matches
Mail list logo
