On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey everyone...
I *finally* got audio working on my Ultra10 here at school. The
2.2.14 kernel seems to have done the trick. However, I am unable to do
anymore then play basic audio via sox/play. When I try to use freeamp
or xmms the
On Fri, 24 Dec 1999, Fleet Captain Druaga wrote:
OK.
Here's what I've got:
Debian 2.1 on a Sparc IPC, 36meg RAM, 200meg (/dev/sda), cdrom (/dev/cdrom)
SCSI ID 6)
I'm sure I've got the kernel installed with audio module installed - I chose
to install that module when I did the install
On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Chris Trainor wrote:
150W is correct. The reason why most PC's have bigger supplies is because
you can put a lot more stuff in them generally. Also, many of the 200W PC
power supplies i've run into wont' run at 200W for too long. :)
Note that my SS4/110 had a problem
On Fri, 29 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you probably are. default setting for /dev/audio is 8bit mono ulaw. a wav
may or may not have a header which happens to be of the correct size to be
one or more audio blocks and hence not upset things when you cat it to
/dev/audio, i dunno.
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Baudin maxime wrote:
Hi,
I installed S/Linux on a RDI powerlite (full sparc5 compatible tapdole)
This computer use an amd7930 as sound chip.
I got problems to compile it for now.
simple answer: turn off CONFIG_ISDN
-D
On Mon, 18 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But if you have an 8-bit wav file, how does endianness matter? I would think
that it would be the same either way. Maybe I'm just naive about audio
formats.
you probably are. default setting for /dev/audio is 8bit mono ulaw. a wav
may or may not
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Jean-Paul Blaquiere wrote:
I'm trying to get my ELC to tftpboot, compiled a new kernel (2.2.6) which
works fine when booting off disk, but not over the network. The image is
being downloaded okay, but then it just hangs
I have read the previous emails on a 2.2.12
On Sat, 11 Sep 1999, Alexander Shumakovitch wrote:
suspect the worst and indeed somewhere on RH site found that parallel port on
sbus SPARCs is listed as unsupported. So I'd like to try 2.2.x kernel hopping
it's less unsupported there than in 2.0.35 ;-) The problem now is that all the
On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Anton Blanchard wrote:
Woaaah Apparently I'm very lucky, because the SLC here wasn't
damaged. :-)) But I can confirm: X doesn't work if a kernel 2.2.x is
running.
(Tested up to 2.2.10) Text mode works fine if you ignore the big wipe stripe
running down on
On Sun, 1 Aug 1999, Andreas Jaehnigen wrote:
Hi Debian Team...
Compilation of kernel 2.0.37 fails here. System is a Sun Sparc 1...
It fails because 2.0.37 doesn't include sparc patches.
Does anybody have a clue why this happens..?
Kernel is 2.0.37. (Need this release, because in
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Andrew Howell wrote:
What's broken about it, i've got a bwtwo in a IPC running 2.2.10 and it
appears
to work fine.
Some people apparently have a stripe down one side or something; I have no
idea, I was just responding in kind to the message; 2.0.37 won't work.
-D
On 28 Apr 1999, Stephen Zander wrote:
New data point for you: glibc2.1.1 *still* fails with a stock 2.2.6
kernel on my SS5-170 at home.
The 170 is, however, special in it's MMU configuration (Derrick only
added 170 support to the 2.0 kernels around 2.0.3[56]). I can
probably test it on an
On 24 Apr 1999, Maciej Matysiak wrote:
Christopher Reid Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When I try to boot my SPARCstation ELC with the first CD, it gets as
far as initializing the RAM disk, at which point it fails with a
'Data Access Exception', and I get put back to the PROM
On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Eric Delaunay wrote:
I really need someone to document how to get tftp install going. If
you could just send me an outline of how to setup the tftp server and
what bootparms need to be set. Does it use DHCP?
No, it uses RARP protocol.
In another week I'll have a a
On Wed, 30 Dec 1998, Eric Delaunay wrote:
1. Is the sound subsystem working for sparc ? Is it wise to include it as
modules in the kernel package ?
Wisest to add the last sparcaudio snapshot from
ftp.dementia.org/pub/linux/sparc/audio most likely... it has a few fixes
which will be in the
On Mon, 16 Nov 1998, Jules Bean wrote:
I'd just spent 10 CPU hours compiling glibc 2.0.100 on my SS2, only to
have it segfault on an explicit invocation of ld-linux.so (which I suspect
is a typical manifestation of the Sun4c/2.0.x kernel breakage).
The generally accepted sun4c 2.0.x problem
On Mon, 9 Nov 1998, Matthew Haas wrote:
There is a kernel 2.0.35 binary which I could have installed as opposed to
the default 2.0.33... if I were to install this one, would it be
sufficient enough to fix my problems (get rid of the syscall warnings)?
The (minor) patch may have been
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Kevin Fowler wrote:
The problem I am having is an Unimplemented SPARC system call 103 and
Unimplemented SPARC system call 119 error. They both appear one right
after the other several times at boot up and anytime I log in or run a
program. I was wondering if anyone else
On Sun, 27 Sep 1998, Elie Rosenblum wrote:
And thus spake Ryan Kirkpatrick, on Sun, Sep 27, 1998 at 06:42:53PM -0500:
To get right to the point: Does a parallel port SBUS card exist
for the Sparc? IPX specificly? If it does, where is the best place to go
looking for one?
You can
I seem to remember a big stink a while back about unimplemented system
calls,
including 103 119. This was fixed in later stable kernel snapshots. I'm
just guessing here, but it could be that libc6 2.0.95 is using more of these
syscalls than previous versions, so if you don't have the
At 08:33 -0700 1998-09-14, Derrick J Brashear wrote:
There are a few more syscalls in the newest code which won't report errors
anymore but won't do anything, which will be in the next snapshot. The
problem
is presumably that glibc is testing for existance but not usefulness of
syscalls
On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Eric Delaunay wrote:
Well, how do you setup arp ?
arp -s hostname 080020AABBCC
rarp -s hostname 8:0:20:aa:bb:cc
I was only required to setup rarp tables on my server (i386 debian box).
Can you explain me in which case you need to also configure arp tables ?
How do you
Just uploaded a snapshot of stable tree with a number of local fixes to
sparc-2.0.35.
You can fetch by anonymous ftp at:
ftp://vger.rutgers.edu/pub/linux/Sparc/kernel/v2.0/980805/
sparclinux-2.0-980805.tar.gzentire source tree
sparclinux-980719-980805.diff.gzpatch against 980719
On Sat, 1 Aug 1998, Richard wrote:
U... let me get this.. you are trying to use the Build in Speaker in
the IPC for sound??? Why not use the proper Microphone/Speaker Jack on the
back... little round socket right next to the Keyboard socket :)
for the purposes of seeing if an audio
On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Marc Duponcheel wrote:
I could give it a chance.
But I am confused: which CVS archive are you actually talking about
(I only know about vger the CVS 2.1.xxx)?
2.0 is a branch off the same CVS tree (tagged sparclinux-stable)
So if the 2.0.35 patch is not too big, what
On Fri, 24 Jul 1998, Derrick J Brashear wrote:
Which of course would entail an update of this.
admin upsd1.0-5 BAD
sparc is missing SIGPWR :-(
The lack of SIGPWR I'm looking into.
Realistically, sysvinit is already using SIGUSR2
On Sat, 25 Jul 1998, Anders Hammarquist wrote:
First off, do you know what graphics card it is (probably a cg6 or a TCX)?
I thought other than the onboard-SS4 8bit TCX, all TCXs did 24 bit?
while ago I used SunOS). One thing to watch for on installing Linux though
is that it doesn't (really,
On Thu, 23 Jul 1998, Jules Bean wrote:
1) For no apparent resaon, X will suddenly blast itself on top of whatever
VC I'm using. From that time on, it will apparently 'own' both VC 7, and
the VC it blasted onto. It is often possible to fix this by explicitly
running chvt vcno (preferably
Wow, just found it in my mirror - guess I should look there more often.
The FPE problem still exists though
Yes, but presumably this is your TurboSparc, and you're using the pathetic
attempt at TurboSparc support I did. The FPE problem is a) only interesting if
people (including you) with
I've been meaning to have a look at it, I just haven't had the time yet.
The repeat delay does seem rather short (I counted about 0.2 s), and
as far as I can tell it's kernel related (though, as I said, I haven't
really had the time to look at it yet).
I don't have any problem with any of
Just uploaded a snapshot of stable tree to bring us to 2.0.35 and fix some
other stuff.
You can fetch by anonymous ftp at:
ftp://vger.rutgers.edu/pub/linux/Sparc/kernel/v2.0/980719/
sparclinux-2.0-980719.tar.gzentire source tree
sparclinux-980625-980719.diff.gzpatch against 980625
Hi,
I did some work on TurboSparc support for 2.0 kernels yesterday; Stephen Zander
helped a bunch by doing some testing (and I hope he'll help me some more, but
we got something useful, read on...)
At ftp://jooky.dementia.org/pub/linux-turbo you can find an image of a kernel,
an a.out image of
There's a new snapshot of the stable tree available.
You can find it over anonymous ftp at:
vger.rutgers.edu:/pub/linux/Sparc/kernel/v2.0/980625/
sparclinux-2.0-980625.tar.gzentire source tree
sparclinux-980618-980625.diff.gzpatch against 980618 snapshot
On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, Derrick J Brashear wrote:
What's new:
- merge to 2.0.34
- sparcaudio supports additional ioctls
- 4231 audio fixes
In an amazing case of stupidity, I forgot:
- backport of math-emu from sparc64 by Peter Maydell
- backport of sys_reboot power off, and notifiers from 2.1
There's a snapshot of the stable tree with 2.0.34 patches included, as well as
some other bits.
You can find it over anonymous ftp at:
vger.rutgers.edu:/pub/linux/Sparc/kernel/v2.0/980618/
sparclinux-2.0-980618.tar.gzentire source tree
sparclinux-980106-980618.diff.gzpatch against
On Fri, 29 May 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can i get the SunOS libs on the net? cause we only have Solaris 2.5
around...
Unlikely, at least not legally. A useful project for someone to tackle
would be a free (presumably BSD-based?) SunOS libc; The idea was bandied
about before and I don't
On 28 May 1998, Stephen Zander wrote:
I think, but I don't know, that you need ibcs for Solaris (though not
for SunOS 4.1). However, I am sure that you need /usr/lib/ld.so.1
(the Solaris equivalent of /lib/ld-linux.so.2). Is that installed?
IIRC you need to install it as
On Fri, 15 May 1998, Anders Hammarquist wrote:
From what I could tell, the bug was not in libm, but rather a case of
missing floating point emulation in the kernel. Get a recent kernel
from vger and try with that (it was fixed in the mid 2.1.90's and
backported to 2.0.3x at about the same
38 matches
Mail list logo
