Re: booting ultra 1

2006-06-19 Thread Jim Crilly
On 06/19/06 01:14:13AM -0400, Matthew Pease wrote: > Oh, man, what havent I tried :) > > I guess this is not as simple as a command to tell the thing where to > find the next piece of code it needs to boot? Surely there is someone > with an Ultra 1 that has run into this! The iso just posted to

Re: tg3 driver fails

2005-07-06 Thread Jim Crilly
On 07/06/05 10:22:06PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 6. Juli 2005 22:11 schrieb David S. Miller: > > > However, I agree that all firmware should be removed from the kernel and > > > provided externally (like done with the AVM B1 ISDN cards). > > > However, Debian _must_ tell then, wh

Re: Question on apt-settings

2005-06-16 Thread Jim Crilly
On 06/17/05 07:31:31AM +0200, Jurzitza, Dieter wrote: > Hi folks, > since I haven't experienced a crossing over from a "testing" to a "stable" > distribution: is it now the time to change the entries in > /etc/apt/sources.list from "testing" to "stable", as I do not plan to further > proceed fro

Re: Low latency sparc64 kernels ?

2005-06-13 Thread Jim Crilly
On 06/13/05 11:55:55PM +0100, Martin wrote: > On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 14:36 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Premeptibility patching is broken on Sparc. > > ReiserFS is broken on Sparc. > Broken as in "doesn't work at all", "doesn't work fast" or "occasionally > causes major corruption and eats al

Re: question about kernel

2005-06-07 Thread Jim Crilly
a woody system in a while so I don't remember seeing that, but I really doubt you need those particular modules and the rest of the kernel should work just fine so don't abort the install. And as long as you keep your current kernel installed, you'll be able to fall back to it if 2.4.19

Re: question about kernel

2005-06-07 Thread Jim Crilly
On 06/07/05 02:01:37PM +0200, gaspo wrote: > i have a debian > [14:00:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/gaspo]$ uname -a > Linux sparc64 2.4.18 #2 Thu Apr 11 14:37:17 EDT 2002 sparc64 > unknownwith kernel 2.4.18 basic... > i want to upgrade with another new kernel... > what is the best way for uypgrade kern

Re: Bug #251149: gcc wrapper for sparc is chronically broken

2005-05-24 Thread Jim Crilly
On 05/24/05 05:38:58PM -0700, David S.Miller wrote: > From: "Jim Crilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 14:42:27 -0400 > > > True, but building kernels on sparc64 wasn't terribly fun for me the last > > time I tried it either so I deci

Re: Bug #251149: gcc wrapper for sparc is chronically broken

2005-05-24 Thread Jim Crilly
On 05/24/05 02:29:16PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 01:32:54AM -0400, Jim Crilly wrote: > > > > > > > > Make the login environment be sparc32 by default. Doesn't that > > > > solve the problem? And for die-hard 64-bit people

Re: Bug #251149: gcc wrapper for sparc is chronically broken

2005-05-23 Thread Jim Crilly
> > > > Make the login environment be sparc32 by default. Doesn't that > > solve the problem? And for die-hard 64-bit people like me they > > can undo this via some configuration mechanism. > > > > It is one option. > > That's probably too ugly for some ppl. Then we'll have to answer the > que

Re: small dns daemon / forwarder ?

2005-05-07 Thread Jim Crilly
On 05/07/05 05:34:19PM -0400, Andrew Hicox wrote: > Hello everyone: > > I have a number of machines behind a NAT firewall. Because I don't like > to manage hosts files on all of the machines, I usually set up bind on > my Ultra-1 running debian. BIND has a zone file for my domain, and > reverse

Re: [Suns-at-Home] debian (IPX *and* ultra1) as mailserver

2004-01-31 Thread Jim Crilly
Erwann ABALEA said the following: Bonsoir, On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Mauricio wrote: I have a little IPX running debian 3 at home and have been thinking on using it as my mail server. What I would like it to do is to retrive my email from my different accounts out there (the one I am usin

Re: "Memory not aligned" kernel problem

2003-12-20 Thread Jim Crilly
Ben Collins wrote: On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 01:15:52PM +0100, Pieter-Paul Spiertz wrote: Hi Marco, On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, marco wrote: I just compiled the 2.6.0 kernel. The compile process is just fin, byt the image i get seems not to be bootable. Right after i select the image at the s

Re: Performance Question

2003-06-20 Thread Jim Crilly
this on the Courier IMAP list: > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/courier-imap > > Your problem's not really specific to Sparc (or even Linux), and you're > probably much more apt to get a good answer there. > > Jim Crilly wrote: > > >The

Performance Question

2003-06-20 Thread Jim Crilly
I recently setup Courier-IMAP on a Ultra2 with 2x300Mhz CPUs because the old slower hardware and wu-imapd/mbox setup was just getting too slow. For the most part the combination of newer hardware and Maildir was a big difference, especially on bigger mailboxes. The problem now is that on the reall

Re: Custom tftpboot images

2003-04-02 Thread Jim Crilly
I would be interested in knowing how to do this myself, if you could post a link to the docs you have that would be great. Jim. On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 03:53, Antonio Prioglio wrote: > On 1 Apr 2003, Irvin Probst wrote: > > > My question is: is there anybody interested in such a tftp boot file for

Re: mysql-server on woody : bdb problems

2001-07-08 Thread Jim Crilly
I noticed this too, but since there already was a bug filed on Jun21st (#101783) with acknowledgment I didn't say anything. I did get mysqld to start with the --skip-bdb switch and it seems to be fine, although I'm not sure what that might/will effect =) Jim On Sunday 08 July 2001 05:50, Olivi

XFS on UltraSparc

2001-06-14 Thread Jim Crilly
I have Debian unstable running on a UltraSparc1 and I wanted to see if I could get XFS working on it which went ok. This isn't really a XFS specific question, so keep reading =) The filesystem itself works, but I felt ambitious and wanted to get ACLs and EAs working from userspace, from what th

Re: Reiserfs

2001-01-17 Thread Jim Crilly
I have no idea if reiserfs runs on sparc or not, I know they're just now getting the Alpha port in working order. The error you're getting is related to a define that they have gotten into the errno.h for i386 but no other arches yet, at the bottom of include/asm/errno.h add an entry like: #de