Re: a small C program to test xdm's /dev/mem reading on your architecture

2002-08-30 Thread Jonathan Amery
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] write: [XDM randomness] /dev/random? /dev/urandom? You are kidding. This randmomness is used to create authorisation cookies for X which in my understanding provide ZERO security. Use plain libc rand() and the security is exactly the same. In the

Re: a small C program to test xdm's /dev/mem reading on your architecture

2002-08-30 Thread Jonathan Amery
[Apologies to readers of debian-sparc, who have already received a copy of this] In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] write: [XDM randomness] /dev/random? /dev/urandom? You are kidding. This randmomness is used to create authorisation cookies for X which in my understanding provide

Re: a small C program to test xdm's /dev/mem reading on your architecture

2002-08-30 Thread Jonathan Amery
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kusti writes: I believe the /dev/mem gets read only in systems where no /dev/(u)random exists. Actually, the standard configuration is that /dev/mem is read. The code to read from /dev/(u)random isn't activated in any situation in the standard upstream X

Re: a small C program to test xdm's /dev/mem reading on your architecture

2002-08-30 Thread Jonathan Amery
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branden writes: I can't believe he actually intends to keep it like this.. I'm going to #define DEV_RANDOM /dev/random for Linux systems. And Debian Hurd? Or does the Hurd not have /dev/random or /dev/urandom? I suspect that /dev/urandom may be the better choice,

Re: 2.4.19-ac1 kernel compilation

2002-08-05 Thread Jonathan Amery
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 12:14:35PM +0200, Wilmer van der Gaast wrote: What's the best kernel for sun4m/sparc5 machines exactly? I'm told I should be running 2.4, but I'm not quite sure about that anymore... Heh, someone told you wrong. For sparc32, the

Re: RAID1 on sparc64

2001-12-21 Thread Jonathan Amery
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: Hello, I have installed Debian 2.2 on a Sun Enterprise 420R. Everything seems to = be working alright except software RAID, which is working fine on our x86 = machines. The patch itself installs cleanly as does the kernel build, it = is just the 'fdisk'

Re: HELP 2.4 booting on a serial console (resend)

2001-11-25 Thread Jonathan Amery
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: Jonathan Amery wrote: Right - I've just been talking to the linux-raid people about raid on sparc (if you search for my name on their archive then it'll come up), the conclusion being that: a) raid in the stock 2.2.X kernels won't work on sparc b

Re: HELP 2.4 booting on a serial console (resend)

2001-11-21 Thread Jonathan Amery
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: Ok, I go for 2.2.20, but still can't 2) - get raid stuff work, at least with 2.2.20 kernel shipped with potato Debian distrib (when I'll come to have stock 2.2.20 run , I may try :) Right - I've just been talking to the linux-raid people about raid on

Re: strange ssh problem with dns...

2001-11-09 Thread Jonathan Amery
vermont.petrologic.co.uk in which case machname is vermont.petrologic.co.uk) -- Jonathan Amery. #The world is collapsing around our ears ###__oI turned up the radio, but I can't hear it. ###'/ - REM, Radio Song