regarding the
hardware Debian should buy.
We encourage the porter community to actively assist DSA with the
resolution of the above noted concerns regarding various ports.
Thanks,
Martin Zobel-Helas
Debian System Administration Team
--
It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation
decommissioning our single remaining UltraSparc II buildd machine.
Maybe it would be a good idea to officially drop US II support from
wheezy since we won't have hardware to test issues on.
Cheers,
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas zo...@debian.org | Debian System Administrator
Debian GNU/Linux
the
best
for USII.
if that means, DSA does not need to operate those machines for the
project any more, i am fine with that.
Cheers,
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas zo...@debian.org | Debian System Administrator
Debian GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster
GPG key http
=sparcstamp=1220273077file=log
it could be a problem with the processort (being Ultra III). I will
requeue on spontini, which is a Ultra II
Greetings
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian System Administrator
Debian GNU/Linux Developer | Debian
Hi Matthew,
On Thursday, 24 Mar 2005, you wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:31:55PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
As many of you may know on some machines users will need to install
a current kernel before they will be able to upgrade woody to sarge
(or better: glibc of woody to glibc of
Hi List,
On Sunday, 13 Mar 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
Therefore, we're planning on not releasing most of the minor architectures
starting with etch. They will be released with sarge, with all that
implies (including security support until sarge is archived), but they
would no longer
Hi Patrick,
On Monday, 14 Mar 2005, you wrote:
I'll make a standard pdf letter folks can print and sign and send if
they'd like.
They cannot kill the sparc line off, Debian is my favorite distro for
Sparc, we've got to do something about this!
that won't work what we need here is some
7 matches
Mail list logo
