Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode

2023-07-20 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 11:03:28AM +1000, Finn Thain wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jul 2023, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > I suspect that this is one of those catch-22 situations: distros are > > > going to enable every feature under the sun. That doesn't mean that > > > anyone is actually _using_ them

Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode

2023-07-20 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 05:38:52PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 2:39 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:50:47PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > > > Then we should delete the HFS/HFS+ fil

Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode

2023-07-20 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:50:47PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > Then we should delete the HFS/HFS+ filesystems. They're orphaned in > > MAINTAINERS and if distros are going to do such a damnfool thing, > > then we must stop them. > > Both HFS and HFS+ work perfectly fine. And if

An fc4 user appears

2010-03-18 Thread Matthew Wilcox
it. Resurrecting it will be quite a task. Best of luck. I'm willing to answer questions (please cc linux-scsi), but not do the work. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system

Re: RFC and status report: Kernel upgrades for woody-sarge upgrades

2005-03-24 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:31:55PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: As many of you may know on some machines users will need to install a current kernel before they will be able to upgrade woody to sarge (or better: glibc of woody to glibc of sarge). I've tried to use the available information

Packages stuck in Uploaded

2003-10-17 Thread Matthew Wilcox
You probably just want to give this package back to the buildd: devel/ocamldsort_0.14.1-1: Uploaded by buildd-vore [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2003 Aug 31 19:33:27 -- It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or victory, it is about

Re: a small C program to test xdm's /dev/mem reading on your architecture

2002-08-26 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 09:06:00AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: Done. I've submitted the output for HPPA boxes running 32 and 64-bit kernels. Looks like they pass without any problem. I'll pass on the yes, but it may well crash them. some parts of /dev/mem map random IO addresses which may

Re: a small C program to test xdm's /dev/mem reading on your architecture

2002-08-26 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 09:10:54PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: Also, reading /dev/mem doesn't sound very secure at all (even if it works) because the patterns in the memory of a computer are probably predictable and a lot of information can be observed from the outside (which processes are

Re: Kaffe porting issues

2001-12-12 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 02:34:22PM -0500, John R. Daily wrote: I'm cc'ing the ports in question in hopes that some of these problems can be solved by developers more familiar with those platforms. I haven't included s390, because the failure to build there seems to involve several missing

Re: Kaffe porting issues

2001-12-12 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 12:56:53PM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote: I'm unaware of a libffi port to HPPA. If there is one, it hasn't been integrated into the main libffi sources :-( Nobody's made libffi compile on debian/hppa yet: $ madison libffi2 libffi2 | 1:3.0.2-4 | testing | alpha,