Re: access to mips/mipsel/sparc machine

Nigel Horne wrote: Joachim Reichel wrote: Hi, I would like to investigate whether my package cgal is vulnerable to bug #431230 on mips, mipsel and sparc. I'm not a DD (so I can't use any official porter machines), but my key 153FF940 is signed by a DD. Is there someone willing to give me

Re: Bug#251149: Bug #251149: gcc wrapper for sparc is chronically broken

David S. Miller wrote: [snip] This is not a bug, it should be closed. On sparc64, gcc should emit 64-bit code by default. If you want 32-bit code emitted on a sparc64 system you have exactly two options 1) add -m32 to the command line or 2) run your build in a sparc32 bash environment.

Re: RFC and status report: Kernel upgrades for woody-sarge upgrades

Frank Lichtenheld wrote: Hi all. As many of you may know on some machines users will need to install a current kernel before they will be able to upgrade woody to sarge (or better: glibc of woody to glibc of sarge). I've tried to use the available information to provide the needed files for

Re: Bug#243924: Status-report (Sparcstation LX) - netinst iso (24. Apr 2004)

Joey Hess wrote: [snip] No, the CD is built with the one from debian-cd CVS, attached. -- see shy jo partition=1 timeout=600 read-only message=/boot/debian.txt default=linux append=cdrom devfs=mount I wonder why the devfs= is still used here. Most architectures ceased to use it but