I am trying to get my first kernel compiled on a sparc using deb-2.2.
I got kernel-package plus kernel-source-2.2.17 on my SparcStation 20,
/proc/cpuinfo says its a SuperSparc50; (and it should contain two, which
are found at boot with the default-kernel (dmesg), but not used - so I
wanted to inclu
.00 15:57]:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 07:19:48PM +0200, Thomas 'Balu' Walter wrote:
> > As I am just trying to do a linuxfromscratch.org-install on that famous
> > IPX ;) (bash-static-compile took 45minutes). I am wondering which
> > packages differ between sparc and in
As I am just trying to do a linuxfromscratch.org-install on that famous
IPX ;) (bash-static-compile took 45minutes). I am wondering which
packages differ between sparc and intel-systems usually (just a
minimal-base system)...
As far as I figured out one of them is
silo <-> lilo
But what are the
Thanks all for your answers. I did a try and err-search ;) and finally
got it working. I copied the /boot/vmlinuz-2.2.17-sun4cdm to
/boot/vmlinuz, rmed the /vmlinuz-symlink and copied it also to this
location. And used image=2/vmlinuz (/dev/sda1 is /boot, sda2 is /) and
it worked... I still have to
+-Ben Collins-([EMAIL PROTECTED])-[25.08.00 16:46]:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 03:52:45PM +0200, Thomas 'Balu' Walter wrote:
> >
> > Which does not give me an error (/boot is sda1, / is sda2).
> >
>
> Do not put /boot on a seperate partition. It confuses s
+-Ben Collins-([EMAIL PROTECTED])-[25.08.00 16:46]:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 03:52:45PM +0200, Thomas 'Balu' Walter wrote:
> >
> > Which does not give me an error (/boot is sda1, / is sda2).
> >
>
> Do not put /boot on a seperate partition.
I've jus
Hiho...
I just got an SparcStation IPX where I wanted to install Deb 2.2. (first
Deb-install...)
Everything seems to work great, but trying to reboot SILO states "could
not find /vmlinuz" (or similar).
So I think something is wrong with my silo-installtion... I rebooted
with the rescue-disk, got
7 matches
Mail list logo
