freebie hardware: sparc slc

1998-09-01 Thread Tom Dyas
Does anybody on this list want a SparcStation SLC with 16 MB of RAM (the max for the SLC) plus Type 4 keyboard and optical mouse? If you pay shipping costs, it is yours. Otherwise, I'm probably just going to throw it out and it would be a waste if another Linux person could make use of it. Tom

Re: Bug#26199: kernel-package: build kernel-image fail on SPARC

1998-08-28 Thread Tom Dyas
On 28 Aug 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > I note that there does appear to be a arch/sparc/boot/ > directory. It seems strange that though the directory exists, the > vmlinux/z file is not there, as it is for other architectures. Is > there anything like vmlinux/z in arch/sparc/boot/? T

Re: Sound suport on IPC

1998-07-31 Thread Tom Dyas
On Fri, 31 Jul 1998, Stephen J. Carpenter wrote: > do I need any special packages or anything for sound? > I configd the kernel sources for a recompile...no sound options in > there either... Answer Yes to the "Experimental drivers" question near the top of the kernel configuration. Then answer

Re: Where is the clock utility reside?

1998-06-05 Thread Tom Dyas
Check out the RedHat clock package o go to ftp://vger.rutgers.edu/pub/linu/Sparc/userland/clock.c It has already been written, Tom On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, Eric Delaunay wrote: > Grigory Kljuchnikov wrote: > > Hi! > > > > In which package reside clock utility? > > I don't find it anyway, but at bo

Re: Nvram/idprom on Sparc 1

1998-05-18 Thread Tom Dyas
On Mon, 18 May 1998, Grigory Kljuchnikov wrote: > There isn't the directory /pub/he/henderso - ftp.netcom.com. > > I know this problem fix after install new NVRAM. But > in my Sparc 1 lost data of Ethernet address and Host ID > and others in NVRAM. And SunOS boot without fix nvram. An old cop

Re: silo problem

1998-02-18 Thread Tom Dyas
On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Davide Barbieri wrote: > > 1) Modify the Makefile so the second stage bootloader no longer links with > > libc. Obviously, the userlevel "silo" utility needs to link with libc as > > usual. > > And how I can do this? silo is linked to libc, because it lacks a lot > of func

Re: silo problem

1998-02-17 Thread Tom Dyas
On Tue, 17 Feb 1998, Davide Barbieri wrote: > I'm still trying to have a silo working with glibc. > > I had some problems, with some assembler code. > > There is a file, called jmp.S which defines the symbol > __setjmp, which is also defined in /usr/lib/libc.a > > So, when it is time to l

Re: inital install & fdisk

1998-01-24 Thread Tom Dyas
On Sat, 24 Jan 1998, Xavier Beaudouin wrote: > On 23 Jan 1998, Stephen Zander wrote: > [snip] > > I was especially suprised to see the dinstaal doc refering to partition > > type 83. Is Linux/Sparc using i386 (I won't say MS-DOS) style > > partitioning? > > I assume yes ! Sparc systems do _not_

Re: Trouble with /dev/audio, PPP

1998-01-23 Thread Tom Dyas
On Thu, 22 Jan 1998, Benjamin C. Kite wrote: > Not to complain, since I've been really happy with S/Linux > so far, but I'm at odds to interface with /dev/audio at all. > Sounds support is supposed to work? SunOS-compatible ioctls were implemented on /dev/audio but not the Linux ioctls. I don't k

Re: pb with modutils & sparclinux-2.0.32

1998-01-14 Thread Tom Dyas
On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, Eric Delaunay wrote: > > This is probably nothing but did you compile modutils with 2.1.x kernel > > includes as required? > > Indeed! Now it works. > Many Thanks. I'll add a check in the configure script to make sure that 2.1.x kernel includes are actually being used. Tom

Re: pb with modutils & sparclinux-2.0.32

1998-01-11 Thread Tom Dyas
On Sun, 11 Jan 1998, Eric Delaunay wrote: > I installed modutils (2.1.71-1 from Debian) but I cannot load modules anymore. > I don't know what is wrong on my system, but I'm remembering I have tried > other previous modutils releases without success for months (2.1.3? for > instance). This is pro

Re: elftoaout? whats that?

1998-01-06 Thread Tom Dyas
On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Eric Delaunay wrote: > You can get sources at ftp.geog.ubc.ca ftp site (the main Sparc/Linux site?) > or one of its mirror. It has no copyright, just this header: > > /** > ** ELF --> a.out > ** Pete A. Zaitcev > **/ > > BTW, I pushed it to my lix.polytechnique.fr under >

Re: SNAPSHOT (stable) 980106

1998-01-06 Thread Tom Dyas
On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Johnie Ingram wrote: > Does anyone know if this also contains the "unimplemented syscall" fix > and the patch so ld-linux.so.2 can accept programs on the command > line? As I sent in a message a few days ago, the "unimplemented syscall" is a libc6 problem. It sees __NR_getdoma

SNAPSHOT (stable) 980106

1998-01-06 Thread Tom Dyas
Quick snapshot of stable tree to bring everyone up to 2.0.33 and some other stuff. You can find it over anonymous ftp at: vger.rutgers.edu:/pub/linux/Sparc/kernel/v2.0/980106/ sparclinux-2.0-980106.tar.gzentire source tree sparclinux-971208-980106.diff.gzpatch against 971208 snapshot

Re: libc6 select problems?

1998-01-05 Thread Tom Dyas
On 4 Jan 1998, Mark W. Eichin wrote: > > I'm working on `strace'... there is a working version (in .rpm > > format) in ftp.nuclecu.unam.mx:/pub/Linux/Sparc-miguel (well, I cannot > > Thanks. Since then I've also noticed that the > vger.rutgers.edu:/pub/linux/Sparc/userland has a sparc strace

Re: Current State of Debian Sparc Port

1998-01-03 Thread Tom Dyas
On Sat, 3 Jan 1998, Douglas F. Elznic wrote: > With the regretful demise of redhat for sparc i am wondering if it is > going to become a lost cause. What is the current situation for the > debian sparc distribution. I also am extremely interested in the serial > drivers. I want one of my sparcs t

Re: Sparcs

1998-01-02 Thread Tom Dyas
On 1 Jan 1998, Mark W. Eichin wrote: > So at least randomly selected SunOS programs work :-) I've also run > xdpyinfo and xlogo (an old build of X11R6 done under SunOS) though > xterm didnt' quite work, probably because I needed another symlink > somewhere... Just point /ust/gnemul/sunos at the

Re: Unimplemented SPARC system call 162

1997-12-30 Thread Tom Dyas
On Tue, 30 Dec 1997, Eric Delaunay wrote: > Hmm, this patch does not seem to work for me. sys_getdomainname is not known. > I just found a sunos_getdomainname function. I'm trying to use it instead, > but cannot tell you if it work at this time since the kernel is recompiling > ;-) > > BTW, th

SNAPSHOT 2.0.32

1997-12-08 Thread Tom Dyas
If you have missed out on a stable version of the Penguin draft for sometime, step right up to the bar and get a mug full of the penguin draft (2.0.32 vintage). It's all on the house! You can find the snapshot at: vger.rutgers.edu:/pub/linux/Sparc/kernel/v2.0/971208 sparclinux-2.0-971208.tar.g

Re: glibc and the sockets problem

1997-11-19 Thread Tom Dyas
On Wed, 19 Nov 1997, Michael Shuey wrote: > That would be nice. Just out of curiosity, is anyone > working on making X go for Debian/Sparc? Many pacakges > either require X to build or have addition features if > xlib is around when they're compiled. It'd be nice > to take advantage of that. P

Re: redhat patches

1997-08-20 Thread Tom Dyas
On Wed, 20 Aug 1997, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > i wondered : did someone try to extract redhat patches from all their > sparc packages ? it's gpl, so we are allowed to take the patches of > other distributions and use them... or doesn't redhat have patches ? > i don't knbow their srpm format...

Re: Install Suggestion.

1997-06-05 Thread Tom Dyas
On Thu, 5 Jun 1997, Stuart Auchterlonie wrote: > Can I make the suggestion that when debian sparc linux becomes available > it is able to be installed with only a serial console... > > Redhat suffers somewhat from the requirement of a console to install. > Quite a number of sparcs are shipped hea

Re: devices for debian axp/sparc/ppc ?

1997-04-29 Thread Tom Dyas
On Wed, 30 Apr 1997, Eric Delaunay wrote: > I don't know exactly which devices are sun specific but I need sunmouse, kbd & > fb0 at least in addition to a generic set. I think these ones are good > candidates for generic-sparc: > > system, > std, floppy-small, > ttyS0, ttyS1, ttyS2, ttyS3, > lin

Re: Debian Sparc Linux

1996-12-17 Thread Tom Dyas
> If it's running RedHat 4.0, you have everything you need to help us get some > packages built for the stage-1 bootstrapping effort. If you're interested in > helping, let me know, and I'll find time to post a note explaining where all > the work to date is stored and how to bootstrap yourself to