Hello,
This email address is no longer in use; please use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
instead.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Previously Kimmo K. I. Surakka wrote:
> I think the "safe" way of getting random data without a decent random
> source would be to write one. This, however, would be more that just
> a small patch.
There is existing code to generate randomness from userland, look at
what current OpenSSH does for e
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
> ssh auric cat /etc/debian_version
woody libssl on there -> can't use
Wichert.
--
_
/[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.lia
Can someone recompile a security fix for arm and for sparc?
Neither architecture has a working rbuilder or a debian.org
machine running potato so I can't compile security fixes
for those two architectures.
Please reply to me directly and I'll tell you what to compile.
Wichert.
--
___
Previously Toni Mueller wrote:
> off topic, but there was a kernel vulnerability for almost all
> kernels recently announced on a very wide basis. How do we
> proceed there? So far I didn't see a Debian-Advisory on this
> one.
Fixed package is in proposed-updates for i386, other architectures
stil
As people have probably noticed we've done a number of security
advisories over the last few days, and doing those has made it
clear that the way we currently do those will not scale with
future release.
The problem is the number of architectures we have to support.
For potato we have to recompil
200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fetchmail secfix
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 22:26:13 +0200
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
build fetchmail_5.3.3-3
fetch from ftp://ftp.debian.nl/people/rvdm/.private
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
> 99.% of the things done to the machines are not posted to
> debian-devel-announce :P
99.$ of the things done to machines don't affect the average
user of the machine.
Wichert.
--
/ Gener
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
> Yeah, it was broken once. Wichert just didn't pay attention to vore's
> motd, so he didn't know how to access it properly. Also note, that the
> only thing on auric that is from unstable is tetex.
Bah, I just don't consider the motd a good place for announcements
li
Previously Michael Stone wrote:
> No, I knew about the new method. But there was something else screwed up
> (no passwd info or somesuch) so dpkg-buildpackage was barfing.
Wasn't that voltaire? But yes, there is a problem with the userdir-ldap
setup: it can't handle having different db formats for
Previously Michael Stone wrote:
> Well, where should we be building them? I recall that the last time I
> was trying to build one, vore's chroot was broken and you said to build
> them on auric.
Turns out there is a working chroot on vore but you now need a diferent
method to access it. Ben just n
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
> This is a growing problem with security updates on sparc. Where are
> these things being built and by who?
Ok, who do I kill.. the stable chroot on vore is running *unstable*.
That sucks!
Wichert.
--
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
> This is a growing problem with security updates on sparc. Where are
> these things being built and by who?
By me on vore in the stable chroot generally. Unfortunately I can't
use the rbuilder since Jason is refusing to put an anonymous FTP upload
reas somewhere and
Herbert Xu uploaded 2.2.19pre17 kernel images today, which fix some
security problems. Could the boot-floppies team please build new
floppies based on those, and could the porters please update the
kernels for their architectures as well? I would like to release a
security advisory for the kernel
Previously Andreas Tille wrote:
> Perhaps new packages for modutils, util-linux, mount could go into
> proposed-updates, to avoid local compile for many people...
Okay, I'll repeat this for the last time:
I will *not* upload a new modutils for potato to support 2.4.*
kernels. The recent modut
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
> My only concern now is, does 1.7.2 work if I recompile it against the
> current libc6-dev. If it does, then the thing to do is start checking
> the diff between these two versions for possible alignment issues.
Run it on an alpha and you'll get alignment warninrs in
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
> Sparc users, keep your old dpkg on hold, don't upgrade it.
No, do upgrade it and try to figure out where exactly it goes wrong.
Wichert.
--
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your c
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
> Bah! File a critical bug on these packages for potato to make the
> maintainer get off his ass and fix this shit!
Crap, the packages work for all other architectures and the sparc
porters simply never made sure the sparc packages are compiled
correctly. Don't blame
Heads up: due to libgtk1.2/libglib1.2 being broken on sparc I can't
build the security fix for openssh for sparc.
Wichert.
--
_
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it a known problem that I can't install libgtk1.2-dev and
libglib1.2-dev on sparc potato? The -dev package depends on version
1.2.7-2 of libgtk1.2, but only version 1.2.8-1 is available,
which makes it completely impossible to compile any gnome app
including the ssh security fix I'm trying to b
Previously Anthony Towns wrote:
> All who're interested: katie (ie, the new dinstall, ie package pools)
> will be rolled out when James has enough time to cope with any unforseen
> problems. Hopefully in the next week or two. "testing" will be rolled out
> shortly afterwards, in all probability.
D
Previously Stephen R. Gore wrote:
> All except xcdroast and strace. Both of these packages need wichert's
> attention wrt building on sparc. He's aware of this, and should be able
> to take a look at them when he get's home.
Aie, hope I'm not becoming a bottleneck here. I'll look at them
on tues
Can someone comment on this? I haven't heard of it before..
Wichert.
--
_
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
> Wichert, are you doing the compiles for sparc/slink to get sparc
> up-to-date with 2.1r5?
Christian Meder (hope I remembered the name correctly..) was afaik..
Wichert.
--
_
/ Generally uninteresti
Previously Vincent Renardias wrote:
> Ok, we'll see tomorrow if it has been accepted.
Why wait when you can easily check that yourself?
~maor/dinstall/dinstall -n xxx.changes
will tell you what dinstall will do with your upload.
Wichert.
--
___
Previously Vincent Renardias wrote:
> [*] pvm_3.4beta7-4_i386.changes
>- security fix.
>[MISSING: alpha, sparc, m68k]
>[Note: doesn't build on alpha]
Also doesn't build on sparc; it tries to use non-exsiting signals.
Wichert.
--
___
Previously Vincent Renardias wrote:
> Paul Slootman has recompiled all the y2k fixes on alpha. You can find the
> files in master:~vincent/INCOMING. AFAIK, there's nobody else who's
> working on the non-i386 updates.
Can you copy them all into Incoming so dinstall can process them today
then? I wo
I just uploaded alpha versions of nfs-server, netkit-telnet & friends,
and bind. I'll try to get some sparc builds going as well.
Wichert (disappointed nobody else recompiled anything while this list
has been out there for 2 weeks now).
--
Previously Vincent Renardias wrote:
> [*] roxen_1.2beta2-3
>- sync with i386 version.
>[MISSING: m68k, sparc]
Those two were also missing in the original release, I'm thinking of
skipping them.
> [*] bind_8.2.2p5-0slink1.1
>- security fix
>[MISSING: sparc, m68k, alpha]
Only alp
Previously Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> gcc -O2 -Wall -I../../../insmod/../include -D_GNU_SOURCE -DCOMPAT_2_0=1
> -DCOMBINE_sparc -DELF_MACHINE_H='"elf_sparc.h"' -DARCH_sparc -DCOMBINE_rmmod
> -DCOMBINE_modprobe -c -o insmod.o ../../../insmod/insmod.c
It does show that its compiled with the right
I just uploaded motudils 2.3.7-1. This should fix all the problems
with sparc32/sparc64 systems.. can somone confirm that?
Wichert.
--
_
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Previously Vincent Renardias wrote:
> 2 packages where missing in the list I posted yesterday:
More missing stuff: roxen and pike for m68k and sparc.
Wichert.
--
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience
.
Wichert.
--
==
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
pgpt4FApIjI09.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
pgpmAjn1GwC1J.pgp
Description: PGP signature
that.
Wichert.
--
==
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
pgp85nGMnQwgM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ed strace and forwarded the patches to wichart, I will
> recompile when he releases the new source package.
strace package is already out there. And it's Wichert.
Wichert.
--
==
This combination of bytes forms a mess
incoming.
Wichert.
--
==
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
pgpcYyY1JjTXz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
n 6 hours.
Wichert.
--
==
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
pgpDcaNPDOEWK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ge
maintainers to try their packages with that.
Wichert.
--
==
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
pgpUZPVfp9ywo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
39 matches
Mail list logo
