Re: /proc/cpuinfo on my blade1000

Hi Antonio! On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 06:53:03PM +0100, Antonio M. wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 04:38:08PM +0100, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: > > > Cpu0Bogo: 499.71 > > > > > > Cpu0ClkTck : 2cb41780 > > > > This is

Re: Partitioning problem on ultra-1 with Sarge

Hi Juan, On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 05:31:08PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I try Sarge on old ultra-1 using CDnetinstall. Boot is ok. HD 2.1 Gb > correctly detected. I chose erase the whole disk and make one single > partition. When appling this politic a progression bar appears (for

Re: PROM update with linux

Hi Hendrik, On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 05:37:32PM +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > Hi, > > I got OBP-3.31 (currently, OBP-3.11 is installed) but do not quite know how > to > proceed. There is no Solaris installed and I doubt that the OBP can read > Ext3. > Can I refer to the update file directly f

Re: default gcc on UltraSparc

On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 10:03:01AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 11:47:48AM +0100, Wolfram Quester wrote: > > Hi alltogether! > > > > gcc produces 64Bit executables by default on UltraSparc. > > I consider this a broken behaviour since many debi

default gcc on UltraSparc

Hi alltogether! gcc produces 64Bit executables by default on UltraSparc. I consider this a broken behaviour since many debian-packages don't build any longer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/sodipodi/sodipodi-0.32.uus.20031012$ fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc checking build system type... sparc64-unk

Re: Want to have sparc-mini.iso working on my Sun Ultra 10

Hi Olivier, > Last query: on this bug-squashing party (next Sunday), I will be happy > to work on a bug specific to the SPARC architecture. If someone has some > suggestions, I will be happy. While configuring iptables on my Ultra 5, I was hit by the not-working limit extension in iptables: http