Re: gtk4: FTBFS on mips64el with Mesa 24.2.x: GALLIUM_DRIVER=softpipe no longer works

Control: tags -1 + pending On Wed, 04 Sep 2024 at 18:51:11 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > src:gtk4 uses GALLIUM_DRIVER=softpipe on mips*, powerpc and sparc* to work > around #1010838. Mesa 24.2.x is no longer built with softpipe enabled 24.2.1-4 re-enables softpipe (#1080475) which

Bug#1080477: gtk4: FTBFS on mips64el with Mesa 24.2.x: GALLIUM_DRIVER=softpipe no longer works

Source: gtk4 Version: 4.14.4+ds-8 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: m...@packages.debian.org, debian-m...@lists.debian.org, debian-powe...@lists.debian.org, debian-sparc@lists.debian.org User: debian-m...@list

Re: Bug#1079124: schroot: regression in 1.6.13-4 when local configuration makes /dev/pts a bind mount

On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 at 12:33:22 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > Please see attached. As with the other known regression from 1.6.13-4 > (#1078539), the proposed solution is a change to a conffile, so buildd > operators could try this manually if desired. The patch I previously attache

Re: Bug#983423: schroot: regression presumably in 1.6.13-4 after fixing #983423

On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 at 01:30:55 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > The reason for the regression is probably that /dev/pts/ptmx on the host > has permissions 000, making it inaccessible (despite being functionally > equivalent to /dev/ptmx which is available to everyone). Yes, it seems t

Re: Bug#1079124: schroot: regression in 1.6.13-4 when local configuration makes /dev/pts a bind mount

Control: tags -1 + patch On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 at 12:10:33 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > I'm testing a patch now. Please see attached. As with the other known regression from 1.6.13-4 (#1078539), the proposed solution is a change to a conffile, so buildd operators could try this man

Re: Bug#983423: schroot: regression presumably in 1.6.13-4 after fixing #983423

On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 at 00:59:30 +0100, Jessica Clarke wrote: > On 20 Aug 2024, at 00:23, Simon McVittie wrote: > > I was unable to reproduce this build failure ... > > There must presumably be something different about how sbuild-createchroot > > and schroot are configu

Re: Bug#983423: schroot: regression presumably in 1.6.13-4 after fixing #983423

dds and my attempt to set up a mockup of a buildd. Please could a buildd operator provide more details of how something resembling the -ports buildd environment can be replicated in a test VM? On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 at 17:02:33 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 at 23:44:57 +00

Re: Bug#983423: schroot: regression presumably in 1.6.13-4 after fixing #983423

On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 at 16:27:24 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > mksh actually does things inside script(1) that use the tty For the purposes of having a test-case for schroot that doesn't require mksh, perhaps a good approximation to this would be asserting that tty(1) from coreutils exits success

Re: Bug#983423: schroot: regression presumably in 1.6.13-4 after fixing #983423

On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 at 23:44:57 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On three buildds, mksh FTBFS already because the whole > /dev/ptmx and /dev/pts stuff is malfunctioning again Which buildds? Are you referring to -ports builds https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mksh&arch=powerpc&ver=59c-3

Bug#1058740: gtk4,librsvg: big-endian support is at risk of being removed

Source: gtk4,librsvg Severity: important Tags: upstream help X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-s...@lists.debian.org, debian-po...@lists.debian.org gtk4 had a recent test failure regression on s390x and other big-endian architectures like ppc64 (#1057782). I sent this upstream to https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME

Re: Bug#1018076: mini-transition: gjs built against mozjs102

On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 at 15:41:04 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Could you blacklist the test > > “ large-arraybuffers/basic.js” > > on all affected big-endian targets (powerpc, ppc64, sparc64)? > > The test is blacklist on s390x and fails on powerpc and ppc64 as well. I'm not intendin

Re: Bug #905825: mozjs52: test failure on alpha: Expected value 'InternalError: allocation size overflow', Actual value 'out of memory'

Control: retitle -1 mozjs52: test failure on alpha|sparc64: Expected value 'InternalError: allocation size overflow', Actual value 'out of memory' Control: user debian-sparc@lists.debian.org Control: usertags -1 + sparc64 On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 at 11:05:33 +0100, Simon McVittie

Bug#905829: mozjs52: tests fail on sparc64: numeric operations expecting NaN get undefined instead

Source: mozjs52 Version: 52.9.1-1 Severity: normal User: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org Usertags: sparc64 Lots of mozjs52 tests fail on sparc64 because the test does some numeric operation that expects NaN (not a number) as result, but gets undefined back instead, for example: FAILED! Number.NEGAT

Bug#887494: mozjs52: FTBFS on sparc64: interpreter segfaults

Source: mozjs52 Version: 52.3.1-7 Severity: normal mozjs52 runs a smoke-test on the js sample interpreter (which is no longer installed, but is still built) to check whether the built binaries are in any way functional. On sparc64, the answer is that they are not: >debian/rules override_dh_au

Bug#884951: glib2.0: FTBFS on sparc64 landau.east.ru: gio/tests/network-address.c:212

Source: glib2.0 Version: 2.54.2-4 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org Some but not all glib2.0 builds on sparc64 fail with: GLib-GIO:ERROR:../../../../../gio/tests/network-address.c:212:test_resolve_address_gresolver: 'test->valid_resolve' should be FALSE which means

Bug#873823: dbus: FTBFS on sparc64: test-dbus-daemon: FATAL-ERROR: timed out

Source: dbus Version: 1.11.16+really1.11.16-2 Severity: normal I recently enabled build-time tests for dbus, having first fixed the home directory issue that made them fail on all buildds. They pass on most Linux architectures, but fail on sparc64. https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=d

Re: Bug#827815: libmozjs-24-0: initialization segfaults on sparc64

On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 at 17:06:00 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > For the time being, Firefox upstream is now using the arm64 workaround on > sparc64 > as well which fixed Firefox on sparc64. Firefox will be fixed on sparc64 with > version 53. Can you point those interested in this bug to

Re: Bug#827815: libmozjs-24-0: initialization segfaults on sparc64

Control: retitle 827815 libmozjs-24-0: initialization segfaults on sparc64 Control: user debian-sparc@lists.debian.org Control: usertags 827815 + sparc64 This is easy to reproduce on the sparc64 porterbox, with or without gjs. Possibly related to

Re: Bug#827815: ostree: FTBFS on sparc64: gjs: Segmentation fault

Control: reassign 827815 libmozjs-24-0 24.2.0-3 Control: affects 827815 gjs Control: reassign 826858 ostree 2016.5-3 Control: affects 826858 - gjs On Wed, 06 Jul 2016 at 20:58:08 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > This one is a segfault in gjs Oops, wrong clone. #826858 is an unreprod

Re: Bug#826858: ostree: FTBFS on sparc64: gjs: Segmentation fault

Control: reassign 826858 libmozjs-24-0 24.2.0-3 Control: affects 826858 gjs On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 at 19:28:37 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 at 10:35:48 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > > - On sparc64 (not a release architecture either): > > > > E

Bug#709781: libglib2.0-0: g_date_time_new_from_timeval_utc() fails on sparc

Package: libglib2.0-0 Version: 2.36.1-2build1 Severity: important While investigating a FTBFS of telepathy-glib on sparc (), I tracked the problem down to GDateTime creation failing. On i386 and amd64, the attached test program outputs: >

Re: gcc-4.6 as the default compiler on sparc

#x27;ll open a bug about that. Sounds good to me -- libidn doesn't build on sparc due to a bug in gcj which was fixed for 4.6.x, and libidn is stuck in unstable. It would be great if this build could be re-tried with gcc 4.6.x. http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2011/06/msg7.html /

Re: failed sparc/powerpc build of libidn 1.22-1

Martin Alfke writes: > On Jun 20, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Simon Josefsson wrote: > >> Martin Alfke writes: >> >>>> /usr/lib/sparc-linux-gnu/gcc/sparc-linux-gnu/4.4.6/ecj1: error while >>>> loading shared libraries: libgcj_bc.so.1: cannot open shared obj

Re: failed sparc/powerpc build of libidn 1.22-1

ing up gcj on sparc? For powerpc, the error seems strange if indeed powerpc has a more recent gcj. The error message suggest it is 4.6.1 though?! /usr/lib/powerpc-linux-gnu/gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.6.1/ecj1: error while loading shared libraries: libgcj_bc.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No s

Re: failed sparc/powerpc build of libidn 1.22-1

Hi, The java code in libidn fails to build using GCJ on Sparc and PowerPC. Complete link to log quoted below, but the relevant part is shown inline. Any ideas? It seems like the gcj compiler is broken on these architectures. /Simon make[6]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-libidn_1.22-1

Re: Bug#352483: link broken on http://debian.org/ports/sparc/porting

Dear Sparc porters, On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 10:50:57PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote: > There is a broken link on http://www.debian.org/ports/sparc/porting as > described by the bug below: > > On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 10:52:08AM +0100, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote: > > Packa

Re: Bug#516869: [www.debian.org] /ports/sparc/ says that sun4m is supported

an release to support sparc32 was Etch, but even then only > > for sun4m systems. Support for the other 32-bits subarchitectures had > > already been discontinued after earlier releases. > > So there's a contradiction. I suppose a revision of that page wouldn't be

Re: Bug#352483: link broken on http://debian.org/ports/sparc/porting

s" that points to > http://sparc.debian.org/ is broken. Could you please give us the replacement link for that ? http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/architecture.php?a=sparc ? I've attached the current wml file for this page so that you can easily provide us a patch. Thanks and bes

Boot sparc 60

ecause the company I bought it from has left their password login on solaris. So I just need to format the drive and start again, somehow? Can anyone suggest anything. As you've guessed, I'm new to this. Regards Simon Tyler

New to Sparc Debian

Hi all,     I will be brand new to Debian (been a suse man of late). However, I have aquired an ultra 60 and wondered what anyone thought of Debian running on this machine and if you have any advise before I trash it. Thanks in advance Si     Regards Simon Tyler Lead Design

Re: Does anyone have software RAID 1 mirroring of / set up on Sparc?

On Wed, 5 Apr 2006 12:20:17 +0100, Ashley Hooper wrote: > Everything's working now, but I find those messages about UUIDs being > different between the various RAID members a bit annoying - anyone > know how to fix that? Hmm, that doesn't sound right. What does 'mdadm --examine ' say for a releva

Re: Does anyone have software RAID 1 mirroring of / set up on Sparc?

On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 23:11:13 +0100, Ashley Hooper wrote: > > It is quite tricky to get right. You might find this old post (about > > setting up Sarge with root on RAID-1 on my Netra) helpful: > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2005/07/msg00143.html > > I tried something along the lines

Re: Does anyone have software RAID 1 mirroring of / set up on Sparc?

On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 11:50:53 +0100, Ashley Hooper wrote: > Hi all, Hi. Please don't start a new thread by replying to an existing one. > I've been struggling with this for the last few days but no matter > what I do I cannot get a mirrored root filesystem on my V240. > Generally what happens is t

Re: Silo and Raid1

On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:01:47 +0100, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: > If you're going to use RAID on the disk, the first partition MUST start > on block 1 (one!), not 0 (zero). Can't remember exactly why (usually I > forget 'obvious reasons' :) but it have something to do with with ext2/3 > inode list, th

Installing on a Sun Blade 100: CD Mounting issue

can use to install from, or a link to a TFTP netboot thing that will work. I cant seem to google any answers. Thanks in advance, any help will be much appreciated. Simon Lewis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[5]: Предлагаем быстро выучить Разговорный ан глийский язык Ilan

What's up? Приходите и узучайте разговорный английский. Это однозначно изменит вашу жизнь. Каждому по скидке! Мы ждём Вашего звонка в Москве: 105 пять-один-восемь-шесть 238-три-три-восемь-шесть Brooks Hofmann Moore Tabmanee Dannewitz Kovacs Quintanilla Gibson Wang Walla Haladus -- To UNS

Re: Software RAID on SPARC64

On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 17:57:22 +0100, David Johnson wrote: > I've been having problems with software RAID (using mdadm) on Sarge on > an Ultra Enterprise 450. There seems to be a bug somewhere causing > corruption of Sun disk labels. > > I start with 8 SCSI disks with valid Sun disk labels and one p

Re: debianinstaller root+raid+lvm on U30

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 13:58:09 -0500, Adam Snodgrass wrote: > Is SILO aware of RAID or LVM? I guess I could go back and blow all this > stuff away and create a non-RAID, non-LVM partition at the start of both > disks for /boot; suboptimal but I guess I'll take what I can get. I've had no end of tro

Re: debianinstaller root+raid+lvm on U30

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 08:53:55 -0500, Adam Snodgrass wrote: > I've been trying unsuccessfully for days now to install Debian onto a > U30 with 2x 9GB Cheetahs using RAID+LVM. (FWIW, a "normal" install > works fine). The major problem is that, no matter which version > (stable, testing, testing dail

happy meal

0Mb/s, Half Duplex. After a google search, i don't have found any reliable solution... is some patch existing to do the task ? thanks for help by advance simon

happy meal

d any reliable solution... is some patch existing to do the task ? thanks for help by advance simon

hard drive problem

by advance simon

buildd failed - xfcalendar

nd why it could find the gdk pixbuf loaders config but anyway. Can someone in charge of the sparc and s390 buildds please retry this build for me? Thanks, Simon. -- Black Cat Networks-( If at first you don't succeed,)- UK domain, email and web hosting -( sky

Re: sparc 5 printing

That would explain the errors I am getting. So do you know what I should do to use the printer on this port?? Regards Simon On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 13:04, Steffan Baron wrote: > > > >When compiling the kernel on the sun box its possible to use pc style > >parports. And

sparc 5 printing

parport on the SPARC. So all is looking ok, prints go into and out of the queue. But nothing gets printed. No lights flash. Nothing. Any ideas what I'm missing?? Anything I should check?? Cheers Simon signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Kernel config for SS5

ernel upto date and worry about tweaking it later. I'm using Debian Woody. I got the kerenl source from Debian. (apt-get) Hope someone can help. Thanks Simon signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

sunlance

Anyone had problems when creating kernel 2.4.18 with it crashing out at the sunlance drivers?? I'm running Debian Woody on a SPARCstation 5. I have a feeling I have missed something from the config but I cant seem to figure out what! It's driving me nuts. Any help would be great! Th

RE: Mail Server?

ter a set of servers then you would want to have the easy upgrade path etc... Hmmm, maybe I should have put more thought into this reply. :-) Anyway, source isnt as bad as it seems. Honest. Simon On Tue, 2002-06-18 at 21:10, Jones, Steven wrote: > Having used "debian's" sendmail

Re: Mail Server?

I run exim and found it to be very easy to setup and run. Then again I only use it for a home office. You would have to look at the exim mail groups for more information about ISP use. SKaR On Mon, 2002-06-17 at 17:46, Ottavio Campana wrote: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 01:27:38PM -0400, Dave Baker

Re: 2 rather strange issues on my sparc running 'testing'

I've just installed Debian on a SS5. I had similar problems to yourself. But I changed my /etc/apt/sources.list so that it upgrades from Potato to Woody. Worked for me. If you need to see my sources.list file then let me know and I'll put it onto my website. Regards Simon On Wed, 200

Re: Sun Hardware Replacement

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Do a network install, all you'll need is rarp, tftp and ftp/http on another boxen, you can then suck the files from that. Cheers, Si snip >>>Hi, >>>I was given a Sun Sparc 2 that our office had lying around. >>>I got all prepared to install Debian L

Re: sun4m and 2.4.x revisited

est user base, is 32 bit. I still don't understand where the problems lie. Which areas of kernel functionality are affected? What needs to be done to fix this? How can we help? Simon Read

Re: sun4m and 2.4.x revisited

would need to be done to fix it. It honestly surprises me that it is easier to port a 32 bit kernel to a 64 bit machine than it is to a 32 bit one. For example, I don't understand the 'provenance' of the SPARC kernel code we use. I remain confused. Simon Read

sun4m and 2.4.x revisited

;t have time to get into major kernel development though. Simon Read

SS20 and woody problems.

architectures. Is this because there isn't a maintainer? Simon Read

Re: updating to xfree 4 with mach64

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09-Apr-2001 Dave Love wrote: > You wrote: > > > I have it running on an ultra 10, I can mail you the configs if you > > still need them ? > > Yes, please. The 4.0.3 .debs don't do any better. I haven't had a > reply from the X list about that

Enterprise SPARC Linux

have an (unofficial) port? Anyone tried running it under the emulation libraries? Simon Read

SS1 with dead NVRAM

. Now, for my question, is it possible to boot the machine without replacing the faulty chip, even if one would have to go through the same procedure each boot? // Simon Kågström

Xsun causes blank screen in potato

don't see Xsun emitting any messages. The framebuffer is a CGsix. Anyone any ideas? Places I can go look for information, error messages? Simon Read Dept. of Comp. Sci. and Info. Sys. Clark 120 American University 4400 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20016 Tel: 1 202 885 3128 Fax:

Setting the hardware clock

is there a Unix command I'm missing? cheers ~~ simon

Re: Setting the clock

red together. I have a co-worker who fixed a SUN I gave hium by cutting open that plastic case and soldering a new battery to it. -Steve On Wed, Jun 16, 1999 at 09:17:39AM +0100, Simon Ghent wrote: > It's not soldered onto the board, it's on an easily removable & > replaceable ch

RE: Setting the clock

It's not soldered onto the board, it's on an easily removable & replaceable chip. Take a look at http://www.squirrel.com/squirrel/sun-nvram-hostid.faq.html for more info. cheers ~~ simon -Original Message- From: Joseph Tam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 June 1999 1

Setting the clock

Hi, I've replaced the NVRAM in my IPX and it's clock is now somewhere in the sixties! Can I set it via a command in SUN OpenBoot, or do I have to do it during installation? cheers ~~ simon [EMAIL PROTECTED]

IPX floppy boot problems

mat type! Program terminated. then I get dropped back to the SUN boot prompt. Is this a problem with the boot floppy or the hardware? I'm awaiting delivery of the CD set - is this problem likely to reoccur when booting from CD? Thanks in advance, -- simon [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Boot problems

the hardware? Thanks in advance, -- simon [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: glibc development

un-sun4u-solaris2.5.1 to debian-sun4c-linux? If so, this would speed *my* development efforts immensely. (I'm compiling my kernels on the ultra at the moment). Cheerio.. -- Simon([EMAIL PROTECTED]) say my name, sun shines through the rain... ... a whole

Re: glibc availability

ive to report; if there's detail I can provide which will help get past this hurdle, I'll do my best; for now, I think I have to just perservere with libc5, as it's the only working environment I have for sparc. Cheerio... -- Simon([EMAIL PROTEC

RE: glibc news

eb > libgdbm1-dev_1.7.3-19_sparc.deb > > :) > > ... fresher source will be used where available. > > On another note, is it just me, or do IPC serial ports freak > out when driven past 9600 baud? > > -- > Simon([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > and I dreamed your dream for you, and now your dream is real > -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

RE: Where's make?

(provides nsgmls > used by dpkg to format the dpkg manuals) and have it > lying around, I'd appreciate it... > > I'm currently fighting my way through apache > patched with microsoft frontpage extensions; this > has meant doing a quick hatchet job on msql and dld > > C

RE: Where's make?

e where I can compile and link > debian source, then yes I'm very interested - bug fixes > to library code don't frighten me, as it's relatively > easy to upgrade libc.so. > > ... again, I can't begin to thank you enough for the > absolutely essential work you

RE: Where's make?

libdb1-dev_1.85.4-3_sparc.debsendmail_8.8.5-1_sparc.deb > > nb: ksmbfs doesn't seem to work, it goes "oops()" as > soon as I attempt to mount an SMB share... > > also, documentation in these packages may be missing, > as some need formatting tools wh

RE: Where's make?

efore recompiling packages, but personally I'd really > love to have libc5.4 available - not only does it > contain NLS, but it also has numerous security and bug > fixes... > > Cheerio... > > -- > Simon([EMAIL PROTECTED]) &g

volunteer

sparc effort by rebuilding packages from the debian-source tree. Is this going to be a worthwhile project, or are there already sufficient contributors? Cheerio... -- Simon([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and I dreamed your dream for you, and now your dream is real -- TO U