Hi again Eric,
> > But how can this happen? I succesfully managed to create a swap partition
> > (about 128 megs)...
>
> Is your swap space really available ? (look at /proc/meminfo)
It IS, definitely! ;-)
In the meantime, I got around this problem by skipping the bad blocks test
and after I r
Andreas Jaehnigen wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> thanks for the reply...
>
> > sorry for the late reply, I was too busy to read all my emails last week
> > :-(
> >
>
> But you know: It's never too late! :-)
>
> > How many memory is installed in your SLC ?
>
> You've got the problem! :-)
> It has on
Hi Eric,
thanks for the reply...
> sorry for the late reply, I was too busy to read all my emails last week :-(
>
But you know: It's never too late! :-)
> How many memory is installed in your SLC ?
You've got the problem! :-)
It has only 8 megs installed - somewhat tiny, hm? :-(
In the mean
message "broken loop device detected...".
If installing on a local harddisk, the image could be copied on the harddisk
before mounting it, thus not requiring so many memory filled up by the
ramdisk.
[**] Such a patch could exists somewhere on the net...
Andreas Jaehnigen wrote
. The source for installation is NFS. And yes, I'm sure
I've set the "root" and "rw" options for the NFS share... ;-)))
But here, after a short while, the SLC hangs with a window on its screen
saying "Broken loop device detected. Copying resc1440.bin to local bef
5 matches
Mail list logo
