Re: Bug#403364: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2007-07-02 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hello Frans, * Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [2007-07-02 15:09 +0200]: > On Monday 02 July 2007 14:21, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > > The "output to the wrong screen" issue is well known, here's last > > upstream comment: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.sparc/7659 > > Thanks for the l

Re: Bug#403364: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2007-07-02 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 02 July 2007 14:21, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > The "output to the wrong screen" issue is well known, here's last > upstream comment: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.sparc/7659 Thanks for the link. Does that address both the "ATI + creator3D" case and the "only ATI" case? What a

Re: Bug#403364: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2007-07-02 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hello Frans, * Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [2007-07-02 14:14 +0200]: > Debian is not the place where such issues get solved, you have to get onto > the upstream list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) or the kernel BTS > (bugzilla.kernel.org). Both issues are probably already known upstream, > but it i

Re: Bug#403364: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2007-07-02 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 02 July 2007 13:44, jim watson wrote: > On my Sunblade100 this is fixed in debian unstable 2.6.21-1 but > video=atyfb:off is still needed anyway to avoid those red dots. Hmm. I seem to be having dejavu experiences in this thread... Is anybody currently trying to work with the upstream k

Re: Bug#403364: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2007-07-02 Thread jim watson
निशांत / Nishant wrote: Hi, On 7/2/07, Thomas Köllmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Maybe this is useful to the next guy installing Etch (or some other >> post-2.6.16 kernel) on a Blade 150 (or 100). > > Can you confirm that with a 2.6.16 kernel the problem is not > reproducible? But now

Re: Bug#403364: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2007-07-02 Thread निशांत / Nishant
Hi, On 7/2/07, Thomas Köllmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Maybe this is useful to the next guy installing Etch (or some other >> post-2.6.16 kernel) on a Blade 150 (or 100). > > Can you confirm that with a 2.6.16 kernel the problem is not > reproducible? But now I am facing the problem

Re: Bug#403364: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2007-07-01 Thread Thomas Köllmann
Hi, Emanuele! Sorry for the late reply -- I moved, switched jobs, started a new and much better life... :-) Emanuele Rocca wrote: > Hello Thomas, > > * Thomas Köllmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [2006-12-17 22:43 +0100]: >> On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:01:07 -0800 >> Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: Bug#403364: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2007-05-11 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hello Thomas, * Thomas Köllmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [2006-12-17 22:43 +0100]: > On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:01:07 -0800 > Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't remember anyone reporting problems with xorg on these > > machines, it would be very valuable information if you could

Re: Bug#403364: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2006-12-16 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 16 December 2006 17:58, Jurij Smakov wrote: > Since you are the only person who reported such a problem so far, I > feel that severity is a bit too high, so I'm dropping it to > 'important' for now. I'm also CC'ing this message to the debian-sparc > mailing list to ask whether anybody e