Hi Rick!
On 1/31/19 4:17 PM, Rick Leir wrote:
> Yes it is possible. However the dependencies would become more complex, with
> the possibility that two versions of a nodejs module would be installed, one
> in Firefox and one in the normal installation. It is do-able but the KISS
> principle
On January 31, 2019 7:37:46 AM EST, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
>On 1/31/19 11:38 AM, Gregor Riepl wrote:
>> What's the point of writing code in an arch-independent language,
>when you
>> *still* end up with arch-dependency due to an unportable runtime?
>
>It's convenience, nothing else.
On 1/31/19 11:38 AM, Gregor Riepl wrote:
> What's the point of writing code in an arch-independent language, when you
> *still* end up with arch-dependency due to an unportable runtime?
It's convenience, nothing else. Firefox upstream used to build the Javascript
modules separately, now they just
> While it's certainly a good idea not to ship precompiled Javascript
> files in the source, the change to build-depend on NodeJS made Firefox
> less portable.
I'm speechless...
What's the point of writing code in an arch-independent language, when you
*still* end up with arch-dependency due to
Source: firefox
Version: 65.0-1
Severity: normal
User: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Usertags: sparc64
Hi!
Since version 64.0-1, the Firefox package has a build dependency to
compile Javascript sources during build instead of relying on
pre-compiled Javascript files.
While it's certainly a good
5 matches
Mail list logo
