On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:45 PM, brian m. carlson <
sand...@crustytoothpaste.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:11:16PM -0400, A E [Gmail] wrote:
> > Hi Brian,
> > This is what I see [Notice the bold bit, which says, Signal 10, Bus
> Error]
> > *Program terminated with signal 10, Bus error.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:11:16PM -0400, A E [Gmail] wrote:
> Hi Brian,
> This is what I see [Notice the bold bit, which says, Signal 10, Bus Error]
> *Program terminated with signal 10, Bus error.*
Yes, this would be SIGBUS. It's an unaligned access, which means that
the software in question is
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:00 PM, brian m. carlson <
sand...@crustytoothpaste.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 01:42:00AM -0400, A E [Gmail] wrote:
> > I can't get past this. I managed to compile the whole software platform
> > under 32-bit but when I try to run it, it core dumps.
>
> When it
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 01:42:00AM -0400, A E [Gmail] wrote:
> I can't get past this. I managed to compile the whole software platform
> under 32-bit but when I try to run it, it core dumps.
When it dumps core, what signal occurs? If it's SIGBUS, then it's
almost certainly an unaligned access, wh
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 6:52 PM, A E [Gmail] wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:47 AM, brian m. carlson <
> sand...@crustytoothpaste.net> wrote:
>
>> Whether you'll see any performance improvement is dependent on what the
>> software does. Perhaps you will. There are some cases where I do in m
5 matches
Mail list logo
