On May 18, 2007, at 5:39 AM, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 18 May 2007 14:05, Bastian Blank wrote:
I have to acknowledge the message from Dave[1]. Until there is a new
kernel upstream it may be possible to compile it but it is impossible
to fix real problems.
Yes, I completely agree with that.
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 02:39:41PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 18 May 2007 14:05, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > I have to acknowledge the message from Dave[1]. Until there is a new
> > kernel upstream it may be possible to compile it but it is impossible
> > to fix real problems.
>
> Yes, I com
On Friday 18 May 2007 14:05, Bastian Blank wrote:
> I have to acknowledge the message from Dave[1]. Until there is a new
> kernel upstream it may be possible to compile it but it is impossible
> to fix real problems.
Yes, I completely agree with that.
However, when you casually propose to _depreca
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 01:10:15PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > - sparc32 deprecation? No fix yet for the cmpxchg problem.
For now I only want to disable it.
> In that thread there was some opposition to the idea, but I've not seen
> anybody making the commitment to maintain sparc32, so dropping
(Resending as I forgot to change the subject. Sorry about that.)
On Friday 18 May 2007 12:18, Bastian Blank wrote:
> I'd like to schedule the linux-2.6 2.6.21-[23] upload for today.
>
> Fixes:
[...]
> - sparc32 deprecation? No fix yet for the cmpxchg problem.
This would have a serious implication
5 matches
Mail list logo
