Re: GCC Status?

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 02:19:49PM -0400, Shawn Boyette wrote: > I just installed on a Netra X1 (which went fine once I realized the > netinst cd just was not going to work due to needing ethernet to get > the kernel and drivers but needing the drivers to have ethernet). I > did a *bare* minimum in

GCC Status?

I just installed on a Netra X1 (which went fine once I realized the netinst cd just was not going to work due to needing ethernet to get the kernel and drivers but needing the drivers to have ethernet). I did a *bare* minimum install and then immediately turned around and dist-upgraded to testing b

GCC status on Woody?

I've heard that only gcc version == egcs-2.92.11 or gcc versions >= 3.1 are suitable for compiling the kernel. I have been trying to use a more recent gcc version, but, to my surprise, I found that the versions >= 3.1 included with sid do not support 64-bit compilation. The gcc-3.0 supports 64-bit

Re: libc6/gcc status

Eric Delaunay wrote: > Hello, Hi Eric, > I'm back from holliday, so I would want to know if anyone have succeeded in > compiling some program with my libc6 package? > Tell me every problem you have encountered (if any). I have compiled this packages: debmake 3.3.6 zlib 1.0.4-7 less 332-1

libc6/gcc status

Hello, I'm back from holliday, so I would want to know if anyone have succeeded in compiling some program with my libc6 package? Tell me every problem you have encountered (if any). Thanks in advance. -- Eric Delaunay | "La guerre justifie l'existence des militaires. [EMAIL