Martin wrote:
For what it's worth I've been using Debian Stable (3.0 Woody) for a
while now (? a couple of year ? well I started with 2.2 and migrated
when 3.0 came out) on Sun machines, including those in production
environments and found it rock solid. It seems to be more stable than
the same
> I'm far
> enough along in the installation where I'm booting off the hard disk but
> still haven't finished up any of the tasks that you do right after
> that. Thanks for all the help... but where do I go from here? Is this
> server going to be good enough for production quality environmen
Dear Listmembers,
dear Jurij,
I see the problem with knowing about what DMA mode seems acceptable, this is
an issue when limiting the boot-up dma speed. What seems possible to me is a
list of machines (because I think this problem mainly hurts older systems and
therefore it should be fairly easy
Jurij Smakov wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Dieter Jurzitza wrote:
Hi guys,
this is an issue I rose around October timeframe with my U60, this is
what
SuSE does and this is what makes total sense (to me):
start with ide=nodma as default setting, check what your system can
cope with
and ac
Hi,
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Dieter Jurzitza wrote:
Hi guys,
this is an issue I rose around October timeframe with my U60, this is what
SuSE does and this is what makes total sense (to me):
start with ide=nodma as default setting, check what your system can cope with
and activate dma later. I have s
Hi guys,
this is an issue I rose around October timeframe with my U60, this is what
SuSE does and this is what makes total sense (to me):
start with ide=nodma as default setting, check what your system can cope with
and activate dma later. I have seen severe filesystem corruption due the
malconf
Hi Brandon,
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Brandon Mercer wrote:
http://ftp.au.debian.org/pub/debian-cd/images/3.0_r2/sparc/debian-30r2-sparc-binary-1.iso
And what you just said doesn't make any sense. First off I'd like to state
that debian is about the most disorganized distro/website/documentation me
Brandon Mercer wrote:
Jurij Smakov wrote:
Hi,
Brandon Mercer wrote:
Ok, I was able to get the 3.0rc2 iso to install on my V100.
Can you specify exactly were you've downloaded this image from? RC2
is the currently "released" version of the debian-installer for
sarge, while 3.0 is the w
Jurij Smakov wrote:
Hi,
Brandon Mercer wrote:
Ok, I was able to get the 3.0rc2 iso to install on my V100.
Can you specify exactly were you've downloaded this image from? RC2 is
the currently "released" version of the debian-installer for sarge,
while 3.0 is the woody version (sarge is 3.
Hi,
Brandon Mercer wrote:
Ok, I was able to get the 3.0rc2 iso to install on my V100.
Can you specify exactly were you've downloaded this image from? RC2 is the
currently "released" version of the debian-installer for sarge, while 3.0
is the woody version (sarge is 3.1), so I am a bit confu
Brandon Mercer wrote:
Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
Brandon Mercer wrote:
Jurij Smakov wrote:
Hi Brandon,
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Brandon Mercer wrote:
Is there a way where I can take the current snapshot and replace
the new version of SILO with an older one? I forget how those
CD's boot w
Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
Brandon Mercer wrote:
Jurij Smakov wrote:
Hi Brandon,
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Brandon Mercer wrote:
Is there a way where I can take the current snapshot and replace
the new version of SILO with an older one? I forget how those CD's
boot with regard to where they
Jurij Smakov wrote:
Hi Brandon,
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Brandon Mercer wrote:
Is there a way where I can take the current snapshot and replace the
new version of SILO with an older one? I forget how those CD's boot
with regard to where they pull the boot information from. Whether
it's off o
Hi Brandon,
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Brandon Mercer wrote:
Is there a way where I can take the current snapshot and replace the new
version of SILO with an older one? I forget how those CD's boot with regard
to where they pull the boot information from. Whether it's off of the CD, or
whether yo
Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jan 2005, Brandon Mercer wrote:
install debian. I hit enter and see some messages about:
Allocated 8 Megs of memory at 0x4000 for kernel
Loaded kernel version 2.4.27
Loadeing initial ramdisk (896142 bytes at 0xCF808000 phys, 0x40C0
virt)...
Remappin
Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jan 2005, Brandon Mercer wrote:
install debian. I hit enter and see some messages about:
Allocated 8 Megs of memory at 0x4000 for kernel
Loaded kernel version 2.4.27
Loadeing initial ramdisk (896142 bytes at 0xCF808000 phys, 0x40C0
virt)...
Remappin
On Sat, 1 Jan 2005, Brandon Mercer wrote:
install debian. I hit enter and see some messages about:
Allocated 8 Megs of memory at 0x4000 for kernel
Loaded kernel version 2.4.27
Loadeing initial ramdisk (896142 bytes at 0xCF808000 phys, 0x40C0
virt)...
Remapping the kernl... FP Disabl
Hello,
I've got a sun V100 that I ordered straight from sun's website. I
decided that I needed a nice server that would run my java web apps from
so I chose to put some linux on there as it's much easier to secure than
solaris. After attempting to install debian stable, testing, sarge,
daily
18 matches
Mail list logo
