David S. Miller davem@redhat.com writes:
If the upper 32-bits of some parameter we pass in has garbage in
it, we'll totally die in the firmware.
From experience reported in my last message, it looks as if this is
specific to the installer (or at least only shows up there for some
reason) and
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 13:23:30 -0600 (MDT)
Jason Wever [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll try this tonight when I get home and report back.
To clarify, the SILO error we get with 1.4.9 on UltraSPARC IIIs (at
least on a Blade 1000 with 'OBP 4.16.4 2004/12/18 05:18') looks like the
following;
Boot
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:Jason Wever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Fr 08.07.2005 17:37
An: Jon BIddell
Cc: Boon Siong; debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Betreff:Re: Installation Problem on Sun Fire V240
***
Diese
So SILO from hd works, but SILO from cd doesn't? I can't think of anything
that is different when booting from CD other than the first stage
bootloader (which is pretty trivial).
The only thing could could possibly be the issue is something to do with
initrd. Maybe some bug haas crept in, maybe
From: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 15:11:24 -0400
So SILO from hd works, but SILO from cd doesn't? I can't think of anything
that is different when booting from CD other than the first stage
bootloader (which is pretty trivial).
The only thing could could possibly be
If the upper 32-bits of some parameter we pass in has garbage in
it, we'll totally die in the firmware.
It's something to consider.
Thanks, I'll keep that in mind when looking into this. Just wish I could
reproduce it.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 -
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Ben Collins wrote:
So SILO from hd works, but SILO from cd doesn't? I can't think of anything
that is different when booting from CD other than the first stage
bootloader (which is pretty trivial).
The only thing could could possibly be the issue is something to do with
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 04:37:26PM -0700, Tyler wrote:
Ben Collins wrote:
If the upper 32-bits of some parameter we pass in has garbage in
it, we'll totally die in the firmware.
It's something to consider.
Thanks, I'll keep that in mind when looking into this. Just wish I could
Hi,
I have a Sun Fire V240 with 1GB
Ram,
i get this msg when i try to boot up with
debian installation cd,
ok boot cdromBoot device:
/[EMAIL PROTECTED],60/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:f File and args:SILO Version
1.4.9\boot:Allocated 8 Megs of memory at 0x4000 for
From: stefan t
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 7 iulie 2005 11:40
To: 'Boon Siong'
Subject: RE: Installation Problem
on Sun Fire V240
I have same problem ! Try removing 512 mb
of ram!
There is not a kernel bug, I guess, since HIGHMEM
support is for 4GB. Anyway, Ive
any one succesfully installed debian on
v240?
can give some advise?
- Original Message -
From:
stefan t
To: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 4:45
PM
Subject: RE: Installation Problem on Sun
Fire V240
From
From: Boon Siong
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 7 iulie 2005 12:10
To: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Installation Problem
on Sun Fire V240
any one succesfully installed debian on
v240?
can give some advise?
- Original Message -
From
Boon Siong wrote:
Hi,
I have a Sun Fire V240 with 1GB Ram,
i get this msg when i try to boot up with debian installation cd,
ok boot cdrom
Boot device: /[EMAIL PROTECTED],60/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL
PROTECTED],0:f File and args:
SILO Version 1.4.9
\
boot:
Allocated 8 Megs
13 matches
Mail list logo
