Re: LEO support and accelerated creator support

1999-04-26 Thread Ben Collins
On Sun, Apr 25, 1999 at 03:00:10PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: On Sun, Apr 25, 1999 at 02:37:06PM -0400, Steve Dunham wrote: We might just want to bite the bullet and do the register_frame_info thing. It has been done on intel, and it is necessary for compatibility with Red Hat 6.0 (and

Re: LEO support and accelerated creator support

1999-04-26 Thread Stephen Zander
Ben == Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ben Please test this out now (sun4m better have a 2.2.5+cvs or Ben better kernel). Also try compiling programs and testing them Ben on RedHat sparc systems. I was all set to go off do this except my SS5 that I sacrificed to the last

Re: LEO support and accelerated creator support

1999-04-26 Thread Steve Dunham
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well I now have a recompile of the glibc 2.1.1 libs using the egcs 1.1.2 where I modified 2 lines to remove the WEAK symbol of __register_frame_info. The symbol is still defined, but now I can compile apps on the new lib and they still run on a glibc

Re: LEO support and accelerated creator support

1999-04-25 Thread Ben Collins
On Sun, Apr 25, 1999 at 02:02:04PM -0400, Steve Dunham wrote: XFree86_3.3.3.1-0pre1v3 with accelerated LEO support and accelerated FFB (Creator) support added. It needs a kernel with LEO support compiled in, and it was compiled against your libc-2.1.1, so sparc32 users will have to use

Re: LEO support and accelerated creator support

1999-04-25 Thread Steve Dunham
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, Apr 25, 1999 at 02:02:04PM -0400, Steve Dunham wrote: XFree86_3.3.3.1-0pre1v3 with accelerated LEO support and accelerated FFB (Creator) support added. It needs a kernel with LEO support compiled in, and it was compiled against your libc-2.1.1

Re: LEO support and accelerated creator support

1999-04-25 Thread Ben Collins
On Sun, Apr 25, 1999 at 02:37:06PM -0400, Steve Dunham wrote: We might just want to bite the bullet and do the register_frame_info thing. It has been done on intel, and it is necessary for compatibility with Red Hat 6.0 (and perhaps Red Hat 5.2). I suspect that if Netscape ever compiles