Re: Latest libc6?

1998-04-02 Thread Joel Klecker
At 19:13 -0600 1998-04-01, John Goerzen wrote: >I would like to help with these. What is the procedure? Ie, how do >the numbers on sparc get changed? Should the maintainer field be >updated? Are changes files to be generated? Does dupload handle >things for recompilation for another platform w

Re: Latest libc6?

1998-04-02 Thread John Goerzen
Michael Shuey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 5) miscompiled packages: > Someone (who is a registered Debian developer) needs to go > back an recompile anything that has IO symbol problems with > the latest libc6. Currently I don't t

Re: Latest libc6?

1998-03-30 Thread Andreas Jaeger
> Michael Shuey writes: > [...] Michael> Okay, here's the deal: GNU's libc6 (glibc v2.0) does NOT support sparc boxes. Michael> At all. Because of this there is no RedHat 5.0 for sparc (they don't want to Michael> hack out libc6 to make it work). The folks at GNU have promised that glibc M

Re: Latest libc6?

1998-03-29 Thread Jonas Oberg
Hi Michael and thanks for the rather thorough introduction to Sparc/Linux libc6. > aren't standard ftp sites for new packages; the ones on ftp.debian.org are > usually it. Then I'll be more then happy to keep looking for new interesting updates there :-) > Others, like vim, have problems. Oh ye

Re: Latest libc6?

1998-03-29 Thread Michael Shuey
er a bunch of issues here). Some packages, like cron, still work, they just display warnings. Others, like vim, have problems. Some, like libpaper, just don't work. When the developers have time they will occaisionally recompile a package against the latest libc6 (980301) and upload the result

Latest libc6?

1998-03-29 Thread Jonas Oberg
Hi, I just recently got started with Debian-sparc using an old base1_2.tgz as ground and then upgrading manually until I got to a 2.0 debian. This was because I didn't know that there was a base2_0.tgz (atleast not that I could find on ftp.debian.org), so my first question is; where are the standa