Hi,
Am 11.01.23 um 19:54 schrieb Gregor Riepl:
On the KDE question - does LO really depend on KDE?
Isn't there also Gnome support?
Yes. *also*.
Which means that it builds both and thus build-depends on both (and it
ends up in libreoffice-gtk3, libreoffice-qt5, libreoffice-kf5 of what
the
speak up at upstream orĀ they will be gone. And without those bridges
no architecture support for it.
Can you clarify what the consequence of this will be? Will it mean
that LibreOffice will become unbuildable for these architectures?
Yes.
Thanks for informing us, then!
I'm 100% in favor
Hi,
Am 11.01.23 um 19:08 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
You may argue that it's okay because it works on x86_64. However, it
only works because Intel
didn't make use of the upper 16 bits of a 64-bit pointer in the past
although these were always
reserved. But that has changed now with the
Hello!
On 1/11/23 18:30, Rene Engelhard wrote:
But I was more aiming at (and sparc* has the same issue) is
libreoffice build-depends on:
- libkf5config-dev:m68k
libkf5config-dev depends on:
- libkf5configqml5:m68k (= 5.101.0-1)
libkf5configqml5 depends on:
- libqt5qml5:m68k (>= 5.15.2~)
Hi,
Am 11.01.23 um 12:41 schrieb Gregor Riepl:
- sparc and sparc64
(which are for many BD-Uninstallable since ages because it does not
have Java (anymore), didn't do a long-ago transition, ...)
[...]
Looking at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libreoffice#problem-17
, it
- sparc and sparc64
(which are for many BD-Uninstallable since ages because it does not have
Java (anymore), didn't do a long-ago transition, ...)
Can you clarify this?
According to https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=openjdk-20 ,
there _is_ a JDK/JRE built for sparc64 (and other
Hi,
I am not giung to fight for this - so if you want to keep
- alpha
- hppa
- ia64
- m68k
- powerpc and powerpcspe
- sparc and sparc64
(which are for many BD-Uninstallable since ages because it does not have
Java (anymore), didn't do a long-ago transition, ...)
speak up at upstream
7 matches
Mail list logo