Hello!
On 4/14/19 11:13 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>> It's probably been there for so long that changing it is likely to
>>> have a risk of breaking some other piece of software.
>>
>> Hmm, good point. We could maybe change it in the Debian kernel for testing
>> purposes and see if anything breaks f
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 22:25:57 +0200
> On 4/14/19 10:18 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
>> Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 09:21:32 +0200
>>
>>> Is there any particular reason this device name mismatch exists or
>>> is it just a bug we can fix?
On 4/14/19 11:13 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> Hmm, good point. We could maybe change it in the Debian kernel for testing
>> purposes and see if anything breaks for our users.
>>
>> I'll report back.
>
> That would cover Debian, but what about other distros whose components
> are looking for the "wro
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 09:21:32 +0200
> Is there any particular reason this device name mismatch exists or
> is it just a bug we can fix?
It's probably been there for so long that changing it is likely to
have a risk of breaking some other piece of software.
On 4/14/19 10:18 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 09:21:32 +0200
>
>> Is there any particular reason this device name mismatch exists or
>> is it just a bug we can fix?
>
> It's probably been there for so long that changing it is likely to
> have
Hello!
We recently ran into a regression in the debian-installer on
sparc64 which made the serial console unusable during installation.
It turned out that the regression was introduced by a change in
the rootskel package [1] and the problem is that "steal-tty" is
not able to find the active seria
6 matches
Mail list logo
