On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >kernel-image-2.4.19-sun4u(from stable)
^^
>
> Make sure you have modutils >= 2.4.19. Those kernels are
> built with a relatively recent version (not in woody) of
> binutils which "requires" a n
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> personal problem is solved. This does not solve the problem that
>
>kernel-image-2.4.19-sun4u(from stable)
>kernel-image-2.4.21-sparc64 (from unstable)
>
> throw these errors and I really have no idea what might cause this trouble
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 07:19, Elie De Brauwer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Monday 16 June 2003 19:33, Kenneth Johansson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 16:58, Elie De Brauwer wrote:
> > > I little quick response, the 2.4.21 package works perfectly on my Sun
> > >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 16 June 2003 19:33, Kenneth Johansson wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 16:58, Elie De Brauwer wrote:
> > I little quick response, the 2.4.21 package works perfectly on my Sun
> > Blade 100, installed from the first time, loaded perfectly after
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 08:31:02PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > This is very confusing. What version of gcc shoud I be using to compile
> > kernels on the Sparc?
>
> You can uninstall gcc-3.3. You compiled with the right version. I
> suspect you did something wrong though. Try my
> kernel-im
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 16:58, Elie De Brauwer wrote:
> I little quick response, the 2.4.21 package works perfectly on my Sun Blade
> 100, installed from the first time, loaded perfectly after reboot after
> following the threads the past few days i think it has to be said that the
> kernel
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Ben Collins wrote:
> > I failed compiling a working kernel fpr my UltraSparc 10, running stable and
> > egcs64. Thus I tried this hint, but it also fails with the messages printed
> > in the end of this mail. It is the same as I reported in this list with
> > subject "Some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 16 June 2003 15:42, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Ben Collins wrote:
> > I bet you compiled it with gcc-3.3. Upgraded the gcc and gcc-3.2
> > packages, and rebuild, or just install the kernel-image-2.4.21-sparc64
> > package.
>
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 03:42:12PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > I bet you compiled it with gcc-3.3. Upgraded the gcc and gcc-3.2
> > packages, and rebuild, or just install the kernel-image-2.4.21-sparc64
> > package.
> I failed compiling a working ker
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Ben Collins wrote:
> I bet you compiled it with gcc-3.3. Upgraded the gcc and gcc-3.2
> packages, and rebuild, or just install the kernel-image-2.4.21-sparc64
> package.
I failed compiling a working kernel fpr my UltraSparc 10, running stable and
egcs64. Thus I tried this hin
On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 15:13, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 03:06:20PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > > suspect you did something wrong though. Try my
> > > kernel-image-2.4.21-sparc64 package. If that works, use the
> > > /boot/config
I wish I had seen this thread before I rebooted into a 2.4.21 kernel
compiled with gcc 3.3. The x86 kernel compiles fine with 3.3, I was
under the assumption that sparc would be fine as well. Now I rebooted
without access to the machine, and I can't bring it up into the backup
kernel until Mond
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 03:06:20PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > suspect you did something wrong though. Try my
> > kernel-image-2.4.21-sparc64 package. If that works, use the
> > /boot/config-2.4.21 as a starting point for compiling your own.
> Any hi
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Ben Collins wrote:
> suspect you did something wrong though. Try my
> kernel-image-2.4.21-sparc64 package. If that works, use the
> /boot/config-2.4.21 as a starting point for compiling your own.
Any hint what would be the right compiler for a woody machine?
Kind regards
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 08:31:02PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> You can uninstall gcc-3.3. You compiled with the right version. I
> suspect you did something wrong though. Try my
> kernel-image-2.4.21-sparc64 package. If that works, use the
> /boot/config-2.4.21 as a starting point for compiling yo
> $ strings vmlinux | grep gcc
> Linux version 2.4.21 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.2.3 (Debian)) #16 Fri
> Jun 13 18:11:31 EDT 2003
>
> This is very confusing. What version of gcc shoud I be using to compile
> kernels on the Sparc?
You can uninstall gcc-3.3. You compiled with the right ver
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 06:37:34PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 05:55:38PM -0400, Eloy A. Paris wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Has anyone had problem booting the just-released 2.4.21 kernel on an
> > Ultra 5? Here it just hangs at:
[...]
> I bet you compiled it with gcc-3.3. Upgrade
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 05:55:38PM -0400, Eloy A. Paris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone had problem booting the just-released 2.4.21 kernel on an
> Ultra 5? Here it just hangs at:
>
> Rebooting with command: boot
> Boot device: disk File and args:
> SILO boot:
>
> Remapping the kernel... done.
> Bo
Hi,
Has anyone had problem booting the just-released 2.4.21 kernel on an
Ultra 5? Here it just hangs at:
Rebooting with command: boot
Boot device: disk File and args:
SILO boot:
Remapping the kernel... done.
Booting Linux...
Thanks God my silo.conf has a backup image (/vmlinux.old), so I was
a
19 matches
Mail list logo
