Re: "No MS-DOS partition table" on bootup

On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 23:00:24 -0400, JLB wrote: > Please HEELP!!! [...] > CONFIG_LDM_PARTITION=y Have you tried nuking this? Moreover, if you want to try 2.4.26 -- official kernel packages for Unstable are in the works anyway. Just sit tight. -- Joshua Kwan

Re: "No MS-DOS partition table" on bootup

You don't understand. It would probably work fine-- BUT the problem remains. The system sees /dev/sda1 mounted as / because the bootloader managed to see it and mount it (which it needed to do, simply to access /vmlinuz itself), but that's it. WHEN I RUN FDISK /DEV/SDA, IT SAYS THAT /DEV/SDA DOES N

Re: "No MS-DOS partition table" on bootup

> JLB > I just installed Debian 3.0 on my Sun Ultra 1. I set it up with a nice > neat Sun disklabel ('s' in fdisk). It boots great. It works great. > > Then I try compiling my own kernel-- 2.4.26, from the stock Linux kernel > sources available at ftp.kernel.org. I modify silo.conf appropriately, r

"No MS-DOS partition table" on bootup

OK. This is totally nonsensical, but let me try anyhow: I just installed Debian 3.0 on my Sun Ultra 1. I set it up with a nice neat Sun disklabel ('s' in fdisk). It boots great. It works great. Then I try compiling my own kernel-- 2.4.26, from the stock Linux kernel sources available at ftp.kerne