Hello
I tried to upgrade from slink to potato via apt and
have crashed my system.
I added the deb for potato to my apt/sources.list
and did a update/upgrade. I got errors about
glibc version. Now, I can't boot. ...err go multiuser.
I can't even log in.
How do I get out of this hole?
John
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 14:43, Brenda replied:
>On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 08:53:09AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 12:20:49AM -0400, Brenda J. Butler wrote:
> > > Ok, sorry for being clueless, but after spending an hour
> > > ...
Oh, you weren't REALLY clueless, you just di
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 08:53:09AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 12:20:49AM -0400, Brenda J. Butler wrote:
> > Ok, sorry for being clueless, but after spending an hour
> > or more looking at the debian site (I have a *really* slow modem)
> > I found a bunch of kernel packages
> You are looking in the wrong place :)
>
> ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-sparc/base/kernel-image-2.2.15-sun4cdm_2.2.15-0.19.4.deb
Sorry, make that filename:
kernel-image-2.2.15-sun4cdm_2.2.15-4.deb
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 12:20:49AM -0400, Brenda J. Butler wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 12:04:09AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > 2. is the 2.2.7 kernel stable enough for production use.
> >
> > If you are running a 2.0.x kernel on a sparc, you don't really know the
> > meaning of stable unti
> On May 17, Brenda J. Butler scratched in indelible ink :
> Ok, sorry for being clueless, but after spending an hour
> or more looking at the debian site (I have a *really* slow modem)
> I found a bunch of kernel packages whose names are:
>
/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-sparc/base/
is the ar
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 12:04:09AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > 2. is the 2.2.7 kernel stable enough for production use.
>
> If you are running a 2.0.x kernel on a sparc, you don't really know the
> meaning of stable until you upgrade to a 2.2.x (2.2.15 recommended)
> kernel. Believe me, the spee
> 1. is that libc6 error a requirement or a recomendation.
Required. I'm not in the habit of forcing failed package installs for
trivial things :) If you don't head that warning, your box will be broken.
> 2. is the 2.2.7 kernel stable enough for production use.
If you are running a 2.0.x kernel
Ahh,
sorry. I wasnt aware how a kernel version number worked.
Thanks,
Aaron
Anand Kumria wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 10:14:11AM +1000, Aaron Daniels wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I recently upgraded my slink sparc5 box to potato.
> > During the upgrade it told me that to upgrade libc6 I needed to in
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 10:14:11AM +1000, Aaron Daniels wrote:
> Hi,
> I recently upgraded my slink sparc5 box to potato.
> During the upgrade it told me that to upgrade libc6 I needed to install 2.2.7
> or
> higher kernel.
> I did so, but this is a production box and I dont really feel safe runni
Hi,
I recently upgraded my slink sparc5 box to potato.
During the upgrade it told me that to upgrade libc6 I needed to install 2.2.7 or
higher kernel.
I did so, but this is a production box and I dont really feel safe running a
kernel that unstable.
So my Questions are.
1. is that libc6 error a req
I've just updated my Sparc 2 to the latest potato packages and now ld always
SEGVs.
Any ideas what broke?
Kernel version is 2.2.10.
I can supply other hardware/config details if required.
Scott
frink:/etc# strace ld
execve("/usr/bin/ld", ["ld"], [/* 19 vars */]) = 0
brk(0)
12 matches
Mail list logo
