ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi, 3. octobre 2002 03:01
À : Roy Bixler
Cc : David S. Miller; debian-sparc@lists.debian.org;
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Objet : Re: 2.5.40 on Sunblade 100 (was Re: NCPFS, anyone?)
> I thought GCC 3.1 and above are OK for compiling kernels on
> Ultrasparc. I als
> As for 2.5.40 on Blade100, I just got a kernel built on mine, and I'm
> about to reboot myself.
Dave, looks like 2.5.40 has a byteswapping issue with the fonts on
framebuffer (maybe just a mach64 issue?). Not only that but it looks
like PCI isn't being probed correctly (lot of errors about unkno
> I thought GCC 3.1 and above are OK for compiling kernels on
> Ultrasparc. I also thought the IDE drivers were from the 2.4 series
> and should be stable. Will I have to eat my words there too?
egcs64 has always been the suggested way to compile kernels from
ultrasparc. Nothing else has ever be
3 matches
Mail list logo
