On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 04:24:52PM +0100, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
I've a ss5 uniprocessor that happily runs:
neo:~# uname -a
Linux neo 2.2.21 #1 Wed Jul 24 14:42:52 CEST 2002 sparc unknown
from years. ;)
If i want to upgrade the kernel, it is better i go to latest 2.2, 2.4
Hi boyzs
Just have a look at http://osinvestor.com/sparc/
I run a 2.4.24 on a SS5 uniprocessor, it works very well
I'm about to test jumping to 2.6, maybe this sunday .
Have a nice day
Momo
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 04:24:52PM +0100, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
I've a ss5 uniprocessor
Had you experimented some problems with ffb_*.o drivers at
/usr/src/linux.../drivers/char/drm ?
Yesterday I tried to compile 2.4.24 (in stable, using egcs64) and always
the process stoped compiling the kernel image at this point. I couldn't
find a way to solve the problem.
I decided to come
On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 16:45, Momo wrote:
Hi boyzs
Just have a look at http://osinvestor.com/sparc/
I run a 2.4.24 on a SS5 uniprocessor, it works very well
I'm about to test jumping to 2.6, maybe this sunday .
I run a 22.23 kernel from osinvestor on my IPX webserver and it works
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:31:21 EST, Ben Collins writes:
You could go with a newer 2.2 kernel with no problem. You could try a
2.4 kernel, since they work pretty well on uni-proc sparc32's.
hmm, I don't concur: I'm running three sun4ms (one SS4-110 and two SS5-110)
and I've had oopses in the ext3
5 matches
Mail list logo
