Re: Linux 2.6.14 & blade 100 framebuffer

2006-01-01 Thread Luigi Gangitano
Il giorno 30/dic/05, alle ore 10:54, Admar Schoonen ha scritto: Luigi, could you put your kernel (2.6.14-6) and/or config/sources online so I could try it? Sure. You can find it at http://people.debian.org/~luigi/sparc64 Regards, -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: Linux 2.6.14 & blade 100 framebuffer

2005-12-30 Thread Admar Schoonen
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 10:22:49PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote: > I have built the 2.6.15-rc7 debs including the atyfb fix. You can get them > at http://www.wooyd.org/debian/kernels/2.6/ Let me and the list know how > it goes. Unfortunately, 2.6.15-rc7 doesn't solve the red dot problem for me. Con

Re: Linux 2.6.14 & blade 100 framebuffer

2005-12-29 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Luigi Gangitano wrote: I just checked my SB100 and I'm using a custom kernel built from 2.6.14-6 and the patch reported in 317756. With this kernel the fb is right and there are no red dots or other issues in Xorg. Everything is fine. Regards, Great, I'll push it into 2

Re: Linux 2.6.14 & blade 100 framebuffer

2005-12-29 Thread Luigi Gangitano
Il giorno 29/dic/05, alle ore 19:38, Jurij Smakov ha scritto: There is a possible fix for the red dots problem: please have a look at the last message in 317756 (the patch was probably garbled during transmission, but is simple enough to be applied by hand). Please post the results of your

Re: Linux 2.6.14 & blade 100 framebuffer

2005-12-29 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Admar Schoonen wrote: I just tried linux-image-2.6.14-2-sparc64 version 2.6.14-6 on my blade 100. Console looks ok, except for some "snow" or noise when text is scrolling. Xorg still insists on 1280x960 at 60 Hz; if I lower the resolution to something like 1024x768 or 800x60