Jean-Francois Dive wrote:
I really thing it worth looking at the native linux implemetation in
2.5. I will upload openbsd isakmpd this week ported to linux. It does
work on intel and i'll do some test on alpha and sun (well, i still cant
install debian on my netra though).
I bet the stack part'l
Chad Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I thought that both Alpha and PPC were little endian...
>
> Nope, big. Intel is the odd duck.
Not at all; see the GCC machine descriptions, for instance. Alpha
could hardly have had a different byte sex from VAX.
Sorry no obSPARC.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 06:26:14PM -0500, Chad Miller wrote:
>
> Well, Mips can be either Big- or Little-Endian. I've heard rumor of a
> jumper on some motherboards to flip it. Of course, that sounds just
> too cool to be true.
ARM can run either way too - and it doesnt even need a jumper :O)
> Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> >The problem is specific to any arch where the userspace and kernel run
> >different bitness. Like sparc64, where userland is 32bit (same for
> >ppc64, mips64 and some other arch's atleast for a short time).
> >
> >Ioctl's from userspace have to be translated in this case
I really thing it worth looking at the native linux implemetation in
2.5. I will upload openbsd isakmpd this week ported to linux. It does
work on intel and i'll do some test on alpha and sun (well, i still cant
install debian on my netra though).
I bet the stack part'll be working on sparc64 as s
Ben Collins wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 09:35:03PM +0100, Daniel van Eeden wrote:
Is it an sparc64 only problem or is ipsec also unusable on sparc32?
The problem is specific to any arch where the userspace and kernel run
different bitness. Like sparc64, where userland is 32bit (same for
p
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:14:56PM -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 07:47:10AM +, Paul Hedderly wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:44:06PM -0800, Patrick Morris wrote:
> > > In my experience, it's been unusable on anything big-endian.
> >
> > Nah many people use fre
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 07:47:10AM +, Paul Hedderly wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:44:06PM -0800, Patrick Morris wrote:
> > In my experience, it's been unusable on anything big-endian.
>
> Nah many people use freeswan on sparc/alpha/PPC ...
I thought that both Alpha and PPC were little
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 08:21:42AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 09:35:03PM +0100, Daniel van Eeden wrote:
> > Is it an sparc64 only problem or is ipsec also unusable on sparc32?
>
> The problem is specific to any arch where the userspace and kernel run
> different bitness. L
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 02:31:02PM +0100, Martin Rusko wrote:
>
>
> Paul Hedderly wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:44:06PM -0800, Patrick Morris wrote:
> >
> >>In my experience, it's been unusable on anything big-endian.
> >
> >
> >Nah many people use freeswan on sparc/alpha/PPC ...
>
> I w
Paul Hedderly wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:44:06PM -0800, Patrick Morris wrote:
In my experience, it's been unusable on anything big-endian.
Nah many people use freeswan on sparc/alpha/PPC ...
I was unable to compile freeswan on Sun Ultra1 (sparc64) due use of two
compilers. One f
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 09:35:03PM +0100, Daniel van Eeden wrote:
> Is it an sparc64 only problem or is ipsec also unusable on sparc32?
The problem is specific to any arch where the userspace and kernel run
different bitness. Like sparc64, where userland is 32bit (same for
ppc64, mips64 and some o
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:44:06PM -0800, Patrick Morris wrote:
> In my experience, it's been unusable on anything big-endian.
Nah many people use freeswan on sparc/alpha/PPC ...
--
Paul
>
> Daniel van Eeden wrote:
>
> >Is it an sparc64 only problem or is ipsec also unusable on sparc32?
> >
> >
In my experience, it's been unusable on anything big-endian.
Daniel van Eeden wrote:
Is it an sparc64 only problem or is ipsec also unusable on sparc32?
Daniel van Eeden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 11:06:51AM +0100, Ulrich Wurst wrote:
Has anyone of
"Daniel van Eeden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is it an sparc64 only problem or is ipsec also unusable on sparc32?
>
I think it is only an sparc64 Problem. Since sparc64 uses a 64 bit Kernel
and 32 bit Userland there has to be a translater 32/64 bit in ioctl
Is it an sparc64 only problem or is ipsec also unusable on sparc32?
Daniel van Eeden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 11:06:51AM +0100, Ulrich Wurst wrote:
Has anyone of you successfully managed to use ipsec on a sparc64 machine?
I've still never manage
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 11:06:51AM +0100, Ulrich Wurst wrote:
> Has anyone of you successfully managed to use ipsec on a sparc64 machine?
>
I've still never managed to get it working. I've basically given up on
freeswan on SPARC64. Hopefully the ipsec implementation that's going in
to Linux 2.6
17 matches
Mail list logo
