Hello,
people might remember my question about the E250 server with slower
disk access than a usual PC which I testet by some dd copying. Now
I found a solution:
$ dd if=hd-test.filenof=hd-test.file.out bs=1024k
Seems that there were not an
Seems that there were not an optimal bs-default value on Sparc for
this
test. If I set bs explicitely this way I got:
Sparc/Solaris: 45s
Sparc/Linux:35s !! (We are really good, aren´t we?)
PC/Linux: 61s
Gratulations
By the way it would be of course interesting, how to
On Wed, 12 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sparc/Solaris: 45s
Sparc/Linux:35s !! (We are really good, aren´t we?)
PC/Linux: 61s
Gratulations
Thanks :).
time cat smalltebledefinition | psql database - real0m0.306s
time psql -e database smalltabledefinition - real
time cat smalltebledefinition | psql database - real0m0.306s
time psql -e database smalltabledefinition - real0m0.295s
may this 0.009s help you ;-)
In fact, no. But I try to find a method which keeps my sparc beeing
faster than my PC, because I could have saved a certain
4 matches
Mail list logo