Re: Sparc include files broken?

At 7:19 AM -0700 7/7/98, John Goerzen wrote: Can we put these changes into the appropriate file (libc6-dev)? The right solution is to upgrade the sources, later snapshots of glibc 2.1 have /usr/include/netatalk/at.h. The other problem, apparently needs to be solved by using 2.1 kernel headers,

Re: Sparc include files broken?

Can we put these changes into the appropriate file (libc6-dev)? John On Mon, 6 Jul 1998, Johnie Ingram wrote: John == John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John /usr/include/bits/sockunion.h:29, from John /usr/include/sys/socket.h:37, from John ../../../methods/http/http.cc:48: John

Sparc include files broken?

Hi, I'm trying to compile the latest version of apt for the sparc platform. I get some very, very strange error messages. I've included them below. Specifically, I am wondering that the heck this /usr/include/bits directory is, what the netrose stuff is (i386 has neither of these), and why it

Re: Sparc include files broken?

John == John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John /usr/include/bits/sockunion.h:29, from John /usr/include/sys/socket.h:37, from John ../../../methods/http/http.cc:48: John /usr/include/netrose/rose.h:23: linux/rose.h: No such file or In /usr/include/bits/sockunion.h, remove the #includes of