Re: Bug#276212: why remove supercollider sparc packages?

2004-11-17 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
On 11/17/2004 08:56 AM, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > I have an UltraSparc 5 (64-bit machine), so I can test this in > principle. It may be a few days though, because it is currently a > firewall running woody, so I'll need to find the time to build a sid chroot. Forgot I already had a sid chroot in

Re: Bug#276212: why remove supercollider sparc packages?

2004-11-17 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
On 11/17/2004 04:45 AM, Paul Brossier wrote: > building on sparc does not throw the ugly messages found on alpha, ia64 > and amd64. so it could well be that a sparc machine with a 64 bit kernel > can run the 32 bit supercollider happily. can you test this? i will send > a mail to debian-sparc to s

Re: Missing Sparc packages in the last packages

1999-02-17 Thread Jules Bean
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > Seriouslsy, what package which Provides: www-browser (chimera2 does not, does > anyone know why?) could be installed in the basic installation? It has to be > something usable, not an experimental toy. (chimera2 says 'This is an > alpha-test v

Re: Missing Sparc packages in the last packages

1999-02-17 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tuesday 16 February 1999, at 19 h 13, the keyboard of James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Mozilla does not appear. This is a serious problem because it is the > > only graphical Web browser in "main". > > Que? What do you think aren

Re: Missing Sparc packages in the last packages

1999-02-16 Thread Steve Dunham
Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 16 Feb 1999, James Troup wrote: > > Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Mozilla does not appear. This is a serious problem because it is the > > > only graphical Web browser in "main". > > > > Que? What do you think arena, chime

Re: Missing Sparc packages in the last packages

1999-02-16 Thread Jules Bean
On 16 Feb 1999, James Troup wrote: > Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Mozilla does not appear. This is a serious problem because it is the > > only graphical Web browser in "main". > > Que? What do you think arena, chimera2, gzilla and w3+xemacs are? And amaya, although I

Re: Missing Sparc packages in the last packages

1999-02-16 Thread James Troup
Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Mozilla does not appear. This is a serious problem because it is the > only graphical Web browser in "main". Que? What do you think arena, chimera2, gzilla and w3+xemacs are? -- James

Re: Missing Sparc packages in the last packages

1999-02-16 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tuesday 16 February 1999, at 12 h 51, the keyboard of Christian Meder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I haven't tried to compile it yet because it's such a disk space hog and > I'm short on disk space on my buildd box. Probably it's safer to remove it > from the packages set. Hop, Mozilla suppre

Re: Missing Sparc packages in the last packages

1999-02-16 Thread Christian Meder
On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 10:18:55AM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > In the last Packages file for Sparc (Feb. 14th): > > xlib6g depends on xbase, which is probably wrong (xbase is just a > compatibility package because of the great X reorganization, no one should

Missing Sparc packages in the last packages

1999-02-16 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
In the last Packages file for Sparc (Feb. 14th): xlib6g depends on xbase, which is probably wrong (xbase is just a compatibility package because of the great X reorganization, no one should depend on it). It happens only on the Sparc. Mozilla does not appear. Th

Re: Sparc packages

1998-04-02 Thread James Troup
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > fakeroot -- NEEDS TO BE UPDATED to fix security hole. I tried > compiling it (compiled fine) but when I would type, for instance, > "fakeroot debian/rules clean", it would cause the make process to do > nothing but eat 90% of CPU. I looked at this back

Sparc packages

1998-04-02 Thread John Goerzen
I am going through attempting to compile various packages for Sparc. If you want to see something compiled, please send me an e-mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I will try to get around to it. Today I had rather limited success: Uploaded: sysklogd -- upgrade, fixes stdin/stdout conflict (1.3-25)

Re: login failure (was: Re: List of Uncompilable Sparc Packages)

1998-01-19 Thread Juan Cespedes
On Mon, Jan 19, 1998 at 11:54:50PM +0100, Eric Delaunay wrote: > > Is it ok to libc6 to depend of base-files (>= 1.3.5) ? If so, can you add it? OK, but not on this release... I'm already uploading it. But I may upload a new one soon. -- Juan Cespedes -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAIL

Re: login failure (was: Re: List of Uncompilable Sparc Packages)

1998-01-19 Thread Eric Delaunay
Juan Cespedes wrote: > On Sun, Jan 18, 1998 at 12:44:22AM +0100, Eric Delaunay wrote: > > > > I added the default /etc/nsswitch.conf coming with glibc sources and now it > > works fine. > > Juan, don't forget to provide this file in your next libc package. > > But it's already provided by t

Re: List of Uncompilable Sparc Packages

1998-01-19 Thread Johnie Ingram
"jdassen" == jdassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: jdassen> Does Debian-sparc have problems with C++ in general, or is it jdassen> this specific package? If it is this specific package, please It was just this program, specifically the configure program in the ddd subdirectory: configure:1469: c

Re: login failure (was: Re: List of Uncompilable Sparc Packages)

1998-01-18 Thread Juan Cespedes
On Sun, Jan 18, 1998 at 12:44:22AM +0100, Eric Delaunay wrote: > > I added the default /etc/nsswitch.conf coming with glibc sources and now it > works fine. > Juan, don't forget to provide this file in your next libc package. But it's already provided by the `base-files' package!: $ ls -

Re: List of Uncompilable Sparc Packages

1998-01-18 Thread Mark W. Eichin
> Does Debian-sparc have problems with C++ in general, or is it this specific Given that groff built (with libg++272 and libc6 stuff) I'd suspect that particular test... -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PR

Re: List of Uncompilable Sparc Packages

1998-01-18 Thread jdassen
On Sat, Jan 17, 1998 at 08:54:58AM -0500, Johnie Ingram wrote: > The following packages cannot be built automatically on my sparc at > the moment (Sat Jan 17). > libslesstif -- attempts libc5 X build Fixed in the version I uploaded Fri Jan 16. > devel ddd

Re: login failure (was: Re: List of Uncompilable Sparc Packages)

1998-01-18 Thread jim
Eric Delaunay writes: > Well, I investigated a bit further and found that login segfaults because > /etc/nsswitch.conf is not on my system. Below is the end of the strace on > /bin/login: [...] > I added the default /etc/nsswitch.conf coming with glibc sources and now it > works fine. >

Re: login failure (was: Re: List of Uncompilable Sparc Packages)

1998-01-17 Thread Eric Delaunay
Eric Delaunay wrote: > PS: my getty (1.0-5 for libc5) does not work anymore with libc6 linked init >(sysvinit 2.73-1) & login (970616-1). Therefore I cannot login anymore >from console (hopefully rlogin still works !). >The following error occures: > >kernel: Fault: login[112]: se

Re: List of Uncompilable Sparc Packages

1998-01-17 Thread Eric Delaunay
Johnie Ingram wrote: > The following packages cannot be built automatically on my sparc at > the moment (Sat Jan 17). > > admin open-- no stdio_lim.h Fixed. stdio_lim.h is no further needed (moved to /usr/include/bits/ & loaded by stdio.h). I submit a bug report & upload the pa

List of Uncompilable Sparc Packages

1998-01-17 Thread Johnie Ingram
The following packages cannot be built automatically on my sparc at the moment (Sat Jan 17). admin acct-- needs texinfo admin cfengine-- no longer works admin genpower-- SIGPWR undeclared admin mdutils -- redefinition of